前进一步,后退两步:通过新的扩大方法和萨格勒布首脑会议结论后的欧盟和西巴尔干

Uros Cemalovic
{"title":"前进一步,后退两步:通过新的扩大方法和萨格勒布首脑会议结论后的欧盟和西巴尔干","authors":"Uros Cemalovic","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Montenegro and Serbia are stuck in the EU accession negotiations, while, with Albania and North Macedonia, the perspective of their future course is very unclear. Between still relatively fluid elements of the new enlargement methodology presented in February 2020 and quite a weak political impulse given by the Zagreb Declaration adopted in May 2020, the potential accession to the EU of the four Western Balkans candidate countries remains not only uncertain, but seems even less realistic than it was after the Thessaloniki Summit in 2003. The paper shows how, just in the first five months of 2020, the path of the Western Balkans towards EU accession has managed to go one timid step forward and two solid steps back. First, some elements of a novel approach to accession are encouraging, but remain imprecise, often inapplicable and subject to potential divergent interpretation. Second, maintained top-down conditionality, combined with internal difficulties of all Western Balkans countries and their high adjustment costs to meet membership criteria could lead to the crumbling of pro-European consensus and a decline of democracy. Finally, the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit mentioned neither accession nor membership in the EU, confirming the wavering political support for enlargement among Member States. The main methods used in the paper are content analysis and the comparative legal method, while the analysis of the Montenegrin and Serbian case provides evidence for the correlation between the weaknesses of the Zagreb Declaration and the hypothesised second step back in the accession process. \nKeywords: EU enlargement, Western Balkans, conditionality, accession criteria, law approximation. \n  \n \nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \n  \nSuggested citation: U Cemalovic, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The EU and the Western Balkans After the Adoption of the New Enlargement Methodology and the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit’ (2020) 16 CYELP 179.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"80 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The EU and the Western Balkans After the Adoption of the New Enlargement Methodology and the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit\",\"authors\":\"Uros Cemalovic\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Montenegro and Serbia are stuck in the EU accession negotiations, while, with Albania and North Macedonia, the perspective of their future course is very unclear. Between still relatively fluid elements of the new enlargement methodology presented in February 2020 and quite a weak political impulse given by the Zagreb Declaration adopted in May 2020, the potential accession to the EU of the four Western Balkans candidate countries remains not only uncertain, but seems even less realistic than it was after the Thessaloniki Summit in 2003. The paper shows how, just in the first five months of 2020, the path of the Western Balkans towards EU accession has managed to go one timid step forward and two solid steps back. First, some elements of a novel approach to accession are encouraging, but remain imprecise, often inapplicable and subject to potential divergent interpretation. Second, maintained top-down conditionality, combined with internal difficulties of all Western Balkans countries and their high adjustment costs to meet membership criteria could lead to the crumbling of pro-European consensus and a decline of democracy. Finally, the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit mentioned neither accession nor membership in the EU, confirming the wavering political support for enlargement among Member States. The main methods used in the paper are content analysis and the comparative legal method, while the analysis of the Montenegrin and Serbian case provides evidence for the correlation between the weaknesses of the Zagreb Declaration and the hypothesised second step back in the accession process. \\nKeywords: EU enlargement, Western Balkans, conditionality, accession criteria, law approximation. \\n  \\n \\nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \\n  \\nSuggested citation: U Cemalovic, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The EU and the Western Balkans After the Adoption of the New Enlargement Methodology and the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit’ (2020) 16 CYELP 179.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"80 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

黑山和塞尔维亚在加入欧盟的谈判中陷入困境,而阿尔巴尼亚和北马其顿的未来前景也非常不明朗。2020年2月提出的新扩大方法中仍有相对不确定的因素,而2020年5月通过的《萨格勒布宣言》所带来的政治推动力相当微弱,因此,西巴尔干四个候选国加入欧盟的可能性不仅不确定,而且似乎比2003年塞萨洛尼基首脑会议之后更不现实。报告显示,仅在2020年的前5个月,西巴尔干地区加入欧盟的道路就成功地向前迈出了一步,后退了两步。首先,加入的新方法的一些要素令人鼓舞,但仍然不精确,往往不适用,可能会有不同的解释。其次,保持自上而下的条件限制,再加上所有西巴尔干国家的内部困难,以及它们为达到成员国标准而付出的高昂调整成本,可能导致亲欧共识的瓦解和民主的衰落。最后,萨格勒布首脑会议的结论既没有提到加入欧盟,也没有提到加入欧盟,这证实了成员国对扩大的政治支持摇摆不定。本文使用的主要方法是内容分析和比较法,而对黑山和塞尔维亚案例的分析为《萨格勒布宣言》的弱点与加入过程中假设的第二步后退之间的相关性提供了证据。关键词:欧盟扩大,西巴尔干,条件,加入标准,法律近似。本作品在知识共享署名-非商业-无衍生品4.0国际许可下获得许可。建议引用:U Cemalovic,“前进一步,后退两步:采用新的扩大方法和萨格勒布首脑会议结论后的欧盟和西巴尔干”(2020)16 CYELP 179。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The EU and the Western Balkans After the Adoption of the New Enlargement Methodology and the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit
Montenegro and Serbia are stuck in the EU accession negotiations, while, with Albania and North Macedonia, the perspective of their future course is very unclear. Between still relatively fluid elements of the new enlargement methodology presented in February 2020 and quite a weak political impulse given by the Zagreb Declaration adopted in May 2020, the potential accession to the EU of the four Western Balkans candidate countries remains not only uncertain, but seems even less realistic than it was after the Thessaloniki Summit in 2003. The paper shows how, just in the first five months of 2020, the path of the Western Balkans towards EU accession has managed to go one timid step forward and two solid steps back. First, some elements of a novel approach to accession are encouraging, but remain imprecise, often inapplicable and subject to potential divergent interpretation. Second, maintained top-down conditionality, combined with internal difficulties of all Western Balkans countries and their high adjustment costs to meet membership criteria could lead to the crumbling of pro-European consensus and a decline of democracy. Finally, the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit mentioned neither accession nor membership in the EU, confirming the wavering political support for enlargement among Member States. The main methods used in the paper are content analysis and the comparative legal method, while the analysis of the Montenegrin and Serbian case provides evidence for the correlation between the weaknesses of the Zagreb Declaration and the hypothesised second step back in the accession process. Keywords: EU enlargement, Western Balkans, conditionality, accession criteria, law approximation.   This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.   Suggested citation: U Cemalovic, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The EU and the Western Balkans After the Adoption of the New Enlargement Methodology and the Conclusions of the Zagreb Summit’ (2020) 16 CYELP 179.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信