{"title":"汤玛斯·阿奎那和让·德·梅恩的意义与神圣,或遗迹","authors":"E. J. Richards","doi":"10.5117/9789462985933_ch07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter asks whether Jean de Meun’s references in the Roman de\n la Rose to relics as a euphemism for genitals actually allude to a much\n larger debate in Paris between 1250 and 1280 about significatio in general,\n and about the religious and political significance of relics in particular,\n a debate in which Thomas Aquinas played an important role. Scholars\n have noted the influence of Ovid and Alain de Lille upon the Roman de la\n Rose, but have not tended to consider Jean de Meun’s scholastic sources,\n particularly his deployment of the theology of Thomas Aquinas.","PeriodicalId":403884,"journal":{"name":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significatio and Senefiance, or Relics in Thomas Aquinas and Jean de Meun\",\"authors\":\"E. J. Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789462985933_ch07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter asks whether Jean de Meun’s references in the Roman de\\n la Rose to relics as a euphemism for genitals actually allude to a much\\n larger debate in Paris between 1250 and 1280 about significatio in general,\\n and about the religious and political significance of relics in particular,\\n a debate in which Thomas Aquinas played an important role. Scholars\\n have noted the influence of Ovid and Alain de Lille upon the Roman de la\\n Rose, but have not tended to consider Jean de Meun’s scholastic sources,\\n particularly his deployment of the theology of Thomas Aquinas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985933_ch07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985933_ch07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Significatio and Senefiance, or Relics in Thomas Aquinas and Jean de Meun
This chapter asks whether Jean de Meun’s references in the Roman de
la Rose to relics as a euphemism for genitals actually allude to a much
larger debate in Paris between 1250 and 1280 about significatio in general,
and about the religious and political significance of relics in particular,
a debate in which Thomas Aquinas played an important role. Scholars
have noted the influence of Ovid and Alain de Lille upon the Roman de la
Rose, but have not tended to consider Jean de Meun’s scholastic sources,
particularly his deployment of the theology of Thomas Aquinas.