用可视化分析技术考察银行信用评级过程

Qiangqiang Liu, Quan Li, Zhihua Zhu, Tangzhi Ye, Xiaojuan Ma
{"title":"用可视化分析技术考察银行信用评级过程","authors":"Qiangqiang Liu, Quan Li, Zhihua Zhu, Tangzhi Ye, Xiaojuan Ma","doi":"10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bank credit rating classifies banks into different levels based on publicly disclosed and internal information, serving as an important input in financial risk management. However, domain experts have a vague idea of exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. A loose connection between subjective and quantitative analysis and difficulties in determining appropriate indicator weights obscure understanding of bank credit ratings. Furthermore, existing models fail to consider bank types by just applying a unified indicator weight set to all banks. We propose RatingVis to assist experts in exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. It supports interactively inferring indicator weights for banks by involving domain knowledge and considers bank types in the analysis loop. We conduct a case study with real-world bank data to verify the efficacy of RatingVis. Expert feedback suggests that our approach helps them better understand different rating schemes.","PeriodicalId":387572,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inspecting the Process of Bank Credit Rating via Visual Analytics\",\"authors\":\"Qiangqiang Liu, Quan Li, Zhihua Zhu, Tangzhi Ye, Xiaojuan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bank credit rating classifies banks into different levels based on publicly disclosed and internal information, serving as an important input in financial risk management. However, domain experts have a vague idea of exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. A loose connection between subjective and quantitative analysis and difficulties in determining appropriate indicator weights obscure understanding of bank credit ratings. Furthermore, existing models fail to consider bank types by just applying a unified indicator weight set to all banks. We propose RatingVis to assist experts in exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. It supports interactively inferring indicator weights for banks by involving domain knowledge and considers bank types in the analysis loop. We conduct a case study with real-world bank data to verify the efficacy of RatingVis. Expert feedback suggests that our approach helps them better understand different rating schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

银行信用评级是根据公开披露信息和内部信息将银行划分为不同等级,是金融风险管理的重要输入。然而,领域专家对探索和比较不同的银行信用评级方案的概念却很模糊。主观和定量分析之间的松散联系以及确定适当指标权重的困难使人们难以理解银行信用评级。此外,现有模型只是对所有银行使用统一的指标权重设置,没有考虑银行类型。我们提出了RatingVis,以协助专家探索和比较不同的银行信用评级方案。它支持通过涉及领域知识来交互式地推断银行的指标权重,并在分析循环中考虑银行类型。我们使用真实银行数据进行案例研究,以验证RatingVis的有效性。专家的反馈表明,我们的方法可以帮助他们更好地理解不同的评级方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inspecting the Process of Bank Credit Rating via Visual Analytics
Bank credit rating classifies banks into different levels based on publicly disclosed and internal information, serving as an important input in financial risk management. However, domain experts have a vague idea of exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. A loose connection between subjective and quantitative analysis and difficulties in determining appropriate indicator weights obscure understanding of bank credit ratings. Furthermore, existing models fail to consider bank types by just applying a unified indicator weight set to all banks. We propose RatingVis to assist experts in exploring and comparing different bank credit rating schemes. It supports interactively inferring indicator weights for banks by involving domain knowledge and considers bank types in the analysis loop. We conduct a case study with real-world bank data to verify the efficacy of RatingVis. Expert feedback suggests that our approach helps them better understand different rating schemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信