电动汽车认证方法的评估

Henry Gadacz
{"title":"电动汽车认证方法的评估","authors":"Henry Gadacz","doi":"10.1145/3488904.3493384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.","PeriodicalId":332312,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of electric mobility authentication approaches\",\"authors\":\"Henry Gadacz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3488904.3493384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于电动汽车(ev)的公共充电,ISO 15118规定了即插即用(PnC)方法。不幸的是,PnC需要相当复杂的公钥基础设施(PKI),并且完全缺乏隐私保护措施。这项工作表明,文献中的其他方法和一种新引入的方法优于PnC。所有13种方法都是根据开发的评估方法对其安全性、可用性、提供的功能和互操作性进行评级的。对于最佳方法,给出了有关更详细的分析和比较的建议。这些有前途的方法应该进一步分析和更详细地指定,以减轻当前的安全漏洞,并为用户提供一个伟大而简单的充电体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of electric mobility authentication approaches
For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信