神经认知障碍患者的神经精神症状管理-使用附加抗抑郁药或NMDA拮抗剂缓解躁动

B. Petrescu, S. Riga
{"title":"神经认知障碍患者的神经精神症状管理-使用附加抗抑郁药或NMDA拮抗剂缓解躁动","authors":"B. Petrescu, S. Riga","doi":"10.26659/pm3.2020.22.4.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the most common type of dementia and it is commonly considered as a memory disorder although behavioral and psychological (including psychiatric) symptoms (BPSD) are largely represented in these patients. Psychosis could explain the worsening of the functional prognosis in these patients, therefore antipsychotic drugs are comonly prescribed. The risks associated with antipsychotics use limit their recommendation and antidepresants or NDMA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) antagonists could represent an alternative. Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the clinical status of the psychomotor agitated patients with neurocognitive disorder on stable antidementia therapy after the addition of antidepressants or NMDA antagonists. Methods. The primary variables of this study are related to the severity of agitation under the action of pharmacological factors. Agitation as part of the BPSD was evaluated by CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory)-short version. A total of 37 subjects (24 female, 14 male) participated in this observational study. They received as add-on antidepressants between weeks 1-8 or NMDA antagonists between weeks 8-16. Inclusion criteria were DSM IV-TR criteria for diagnosing dementia, AD and vascular dementia (VD) and also NINDS-ADRDA clinical criteria. Data analysis was achieved through SPSS software, version 20, using ANOVA- paired t-tests and independent t tests. Results. The efficacy of memantine over general agitation was significantly superior to antidepressants. Regarding the modulation of the CMAI scores evolution by the type of neurocognitive disorder, treatment and duration, it was observed that the statistical difference between groups became significant after 8-16 weeks of memantine treatment. At the endpoint visit the decrease in agitation was superior in the AD versus VD group (p = 0.012). Conclusions. The overall trend was toward a decrease of the agitation severity after each treatment trial for both types of dementia, including cumulative drugs effects. In the literature, the data are controversial in terms of prescribing antidepressants in the neurocognitive disorders even when BPSD is important, the keystone being the general consensus of limiting the use of antipsychotics and polypharmacy.","PeriodicalId":263837,"journal":{"name":"Health, Sports & Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with neurocognitive disorder - using add-on antidepressants or NMDA antagonists in relieving agitation\",\"authors\":\"B. Petrescu, S. Riga\",\"doi\":\"10.26659/pm3.2020.22.4.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the most common type of dementia and it is commonly considered as a memory disorder although behavioral and psychological (including psychiatric) symptoms (BPSD) are largely represented in these patients. Psychosis could explain the worsening of the functional prognosis in these patients, therefore antipsychotic drugs are comonly prescribed. The risks associated with antipsychotics use limit their recommendation and antidepresants or NDMA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) antagonists could represent an alternative. Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the clinical status of the psychomotor agitated patients with neurocognitive disorder on stable antidementia therapy after the addition of antidepressants or NMDA antagonists. Methods. The primary variables of this study are related to the severity of agitation under the action of pharmacological factors. Agitation as part of the BPSD was evaluated by CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory)-short version. A total of 37 subjects (24 female, 14 male) participated in this observational study. They received as add-on antidepressants between weeks 1-8 or NMDA antagonists between weeks 8-16. Inclusion criteria were DSM IV-TR criteria for diagnosing dementia, AD and vascular dementia (VD) and also NINDS-ADRDA clinical criteria. Data analysis was achieved through SPSS software, version 20, using ANOVA- paired t-tests and independent t tests. Results. The efficacy of memantine over general agitation was significantly superior to antidepressants. Regarding the modulation of the CMAI scores evolution by the type of neurocognitive disorder, treatment and duration, it was observed that the statistical difference between groups became significant after 8-16 weeks of memantine treatment. At the endpoint visit the decrease in agitation was superior in the AD versus VD group (p = 0.012). Conclusions. The overall trend was toward a decrease of the agitation severity after each treatment trial for both types of dementia, including cumulative drugs effects. In the literature, the data are controversial in terms of prescribing antidepressants in the neurocognitive disorders even when BPSD is important, the keystone being the general consensus of limiting the use of antipsychotics and polypharmacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health, Sports & Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health, Sports & Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26659/pm3.2020.22.4.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health, Sports & Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26659/pm3.2020.22.4.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。阿尔茨海默病(AD)是迄今为止最常见的痴呆症类型,它通常被认为是一种记忆障碍,尽管这些患者主要表现为行为和心理(包括精神病学)症状(BPSD)。精神病可以解释这些患者功能预后的恶化,因此抗精神病药物通常被开。与使用抗精神病药物相关的风险限制了它们的推荐,抗抑郁药或NDMA (n -甲基-d-天冬氨酸)拮抗剂可能是一种选择。目标本研究的目的是评估精神运动性激动的神经认知障碍患者在稳定的抗痴呆治疗后添加抗抑郁药或NMDA拮抗剂后临床状态的变化。方法。本研究的主要变量与药理因素作用下躁动的严重程度有关。搅拌作为BPSD的一部分,采用CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield搅拌量表)-短版进行评估。共有37名受试者(24名女性,14名男性)参与了本观察性研究。他们在第1-8周服用抗抑郁药,在第8-16周服用NMDA拮抗剂。纳入标准为诊断痴呆、AD和血管性痴呆(VD)的DSM IV-TR标准和NINDS-ADRDA临床标准。数据分析采用SPSS软件第20版,采用方差分析-配对t检验和独立t检验。结果。美金刚治疗一般躁动的疗效明显优于抗抑郁药。关于神经认知障碍类型、治疗和持续时间对CMAI评分演变的调节作用,我们观察到,在美金刚治疗8-16周后,两组间的统计学差异变得显著。在终点访问时,AD组的躁动减少优于VD组(p = 0.012)。结论。总的趋势是,在两种类型的痴呆症的每次治疗试验后,包括累积药物效应,躁动严重程度都有所下降。在文献中,即使在BPSD很重要的情况下,在神经认知障碍的抗抑郁药物处方方面,数据是有争议的,关键是限制抗精神病药物和综合药物的使用的普遍共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with neurocognitive disorder - using add-on antidepressants or NMDA antagonists in relieving agitation
Background. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the most common type of dementia and it is commonly considered as a memory disorder although behavioral and psychological (including psychiatric) symptoms (BPSD) are largely represented in these patients. Psychosis could explain the worsening of the functional prognosis in these patients, therefore antipsychotic drugs are comonly prescribed. The risks associated with antipsychotics use limit their recommendation and antidepresants or NDMA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) antagonists could represent an alternative. Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the clinical status of the psychomotor agitated patients with neurocognitive disorder on stable antidementia therapy after the addition of antidepressants or NMDA antagonists. Methods. The primary variables of this study are related to the severity of agitation under the action of pharmacological factors. Agitation as part of the BPSD was evaluated by CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory)-short version. A total of 37 subjects (24 female, 14 male) participated in this observational study. They received as add-on antidepressants between weeks 1-8 or NMDA antagonists between weeks 8-16. Inclusion criteria were DSM IV-TR criteria for diagnosing dementia, AD and vascular dementia (VD) and also NINDS-ADRDA clinical criteria. Data analysis was achieved through SPSS software, version 20, using ANOVA- paired t-tests and independent t tests. Results. The efficacy of memantine over general agitation was significantly superior to antidepressants. Regarding the modulation of the CMAI scores evolution by the type of neurocognitive disorder, treatment and duration, it was observed that the statistical difference between groups became significant after 8-16 weeks of memantine treatment. At the endpoint visit the decrease in agitation was superior in the AD versus VD group (p = 0.012). Conclusions. The overall trend was toward a decrease of the agitation severity after each treatment trial for both types of dementia, including cumulative drugs effects. In the literature, the data are controversial in terms of prescribing antidepressants in the neurocognitive disorders even when BPSD is important, the keystone being the general consensus of limiting the use of antipsychotics and polypharmacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信