使用模型检查来验证特定于风格的架构重构模式

Z. Stephenson, J. Mcdermid
{"title":"使用模型检查来验证特定于风格的架构重构模式","authors":"Z. Stephenson, J. Mcdermid","doi":"10.1109/SEW.2007.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When developing a new domain-specific architectural style, there can be uncertainty about the feasibility of using that style. In particular, the HADES architectural style contains refactoring patterns intended to remove undesirable scheduling features such as deadlock and livelock, but these patterns have not yet been fully validated. We report on the translation between the HADES structure and the input languages for two popular model checkers (SPIN and NuSMV) to help validate these patterns. We found model checking to be a valuable asset in confirming the presence of undesirable features.","PeriodicalId":277367,"journal":{"name":"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Model Checking to Validate Style-Specific Architectural Refactoring Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Z. Stephenson, J. Mcdermid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEW.2007.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When developing a new domain-specific architectural style, there can be uncertainty about the feasibility of using that style. In particular, the HADES architectural style contains refactoring patterns intended to remove undesirable scheduling features such as deadlock and livelock, but these patterns have not yet been fully validated. We report on the translation between the HADES structure and the input languages for two popular model checkers (SPIN and NuSMV) to help validate these patterns. We found model checking to be a valuable asset in confirming the presence of undesirable features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2007.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"31st IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2007.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开发新的特定于领域的体系结构风格时,使用该风格的可行性可能存在不确定性。特别地,HADES体系结构风格包含了一些重构模式,这些模式旨在去除死锁和活动锁等不需要的调度特性,但这些模式尚未得到充分验证。我们报告了两种流行的模型检查器(SPIN和NuSMV)的HADES结构和输入语言之间的转换,以帮助验证这些模式。我们发现模型检查在确认不良特征的存在方面是一项有价值的资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Model Checking to Validate Style-Specific Architectural Refactoring Patterns
When developing a new domain-specific architectural style, there can be uncertainty about the feasibility of using that style. In particular, the HADES architectural style contains refactoring patterns intended to remove undesirable scheduling features such as deadlock and livelock, but these patterns have not yet been fully validated. We report on the translation between the HADES structure and the input languages for two popular model checkers (SPIN and NuSMV) to help validate these patterns. We found model checking to be a valuable asset in confirming the presence of undesirable features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信