妊娠早期经腹和经阴道扫描评估宫颈长度。

L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva
{"title":"妊娠早期经腹和经阴道扫描评估宫颈长度。","authors":"L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva","doi":"10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. \nMethod \nA validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. \nResults \nThe mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). \nPost-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. \nConclusion \nPre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.","PeriodicalId":186118,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal scans during early pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. \\nMethod \\nA validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. \\nResults \\nThe mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). \\nPost-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. \\nConclusion \\nPre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较经腹扫描(TAS)和经阴道扫描(TVS)评估宫颈长度的测量方法和客户偏好。方法对568例闭经期为11+0 ~ 22+6周的孕妇进行患者偏好横断面成分验证研究。对空腔前后的TAS和空腔后的TVS进行测量。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估在不同长度的宫颈上使用空前和空后TAS对短宫颈的检测。结果参与者的平均(SD)年龄为28.4(5.7)岁,平均胎龄为14+1周。空腔前TAS、空腔后TAS和TVS检测到的平均颈椎长度分别为32.2 (5.8)mm、28.9 (5.8)mm和34.4 (5.3)mm。与TVS宫颈长度增高相关的因素有:年龄增加(p<0.001)、妊娠加重(p<0.001)、胎次增加(p<0.001)和阴道分娩次数增加(p<0.001)。TAS和TVS测量值之间存在显著相关(p<0.001)。无效后TAS无法测量的占49.47%。预空TAS可检测到的最短颈椎长度为26mm,理想截距为33mm。对于空洞后TAS,最短长度为28mm,理想截止长度为28.16mm。大多数人更喜欢TAS而不是电视。结论空腔前TAS对26mm以下颈椎长度的预测准确率为87.5%,而空腔后TAS预测的最短长度相对较长。近一半的无效后TAS无法记录。客户偏好对TAS更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal scans during early pregnancy.
Objective To compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. Method A validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. Results The mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). Post-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. Conclusion Pre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信