L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva
{"title":"妊娠早期经腹和经阴道扫描评估宫颈长度。","authors":"L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva","doi":"10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. \nMethod \nA validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. \nResults \nThe mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). \nPost-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. \nConclusion \nPre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.","PeriodicalId":186118,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal scans during early pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"L. Ruwanpura, J. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, G. Ratnayake, T. Dias, D. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. \\nMethod \\nA validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. \\nResults \\nThe mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). \\nPost-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. \\nConclusion \\nPre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJOG.V43I2.7986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal scans during early pregnancy.
Objective
To compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length.
Method
A validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix.
Results
The mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001).
Post-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS.
Conclusion
Pre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.