{"title":"健康个体与自信呼吸异常患者的区别","authors":"Masara Yamashita, Tasuku Miura, S. Matsunaga","doi":"10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a \"confident abnormal respiration\" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.","PeriodicalId":142091,"journal":{"name":"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinction between healthy individuals and patients with confident abnormal respiration\",\"authors\":\"Masara Yamashita, Tasuku Miura, S. Matsunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a \\\"confident abnormal respiration\\\" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Distinction between healthy individuals and patients with confident abnormal respiration
To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a "confident abnormal respiration" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.