健康个体与自信呼吸异常患者的区别

Masara Yamashita, Tasuku Miura, S. Matsunaga
{"title":"健康个体与自信呼吸异常患者的区别","authors":"Masara Yamashita, Tasuku Miura, S. Matsunaga","doi":"10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a \"confident abnormal respiration\" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.","PeriodicalId":142091,"journal":{"name":"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinction between healthy individuals and patients with confident abnormal respiration\",\"authors\":\"Masara Yamashita, Tasuku Miura, S. Matsunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a \\\"confident abnormal respiration\\\" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2017.8282199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了充分区分健康个体和呼吸系统疾病患者,我们提出了一种结合两种传统方法的新分类方法。第一种方法需要确定是否存在“确信的呼吸异常”时期(用于描述异常呼吸候选者的可能性远远高于正常候选者的可能性,并且可以以高准确性确定患者的个体)。第二种方法需要比较测试样本中每个呼吸周期的正常和异常候选者的两个总可能性(通过一系列吸气和呼气周期)。在我们的新方法中,如果在测试呼吸样本中检测到一个或多个可靠的异常呼吸阶段,则使用第一种方法;否则,使用第二种方法进行分类。在5%的水平上(p=0.027),我们提出的方法比单独使用每种传统分类方法(80.6%和84.9%)取得了显著更高的性能(88.6%)。这验证了我们新提出的分类方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinction between healthy individuals and patients with confident abnormal respiration
To adequately distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with respiratory disorders, we propose a new classification method combining two conventional methods. The first method entails determining the presence of a "confident abnormal respiration" period (used to describe individuals for whom the likelihood of an abnormal respiratory candidate was much higher than for that of a normal candidate, and for which patients could be determined with high accuracy). The second method entails comparing the two total likelihoods (through a series of inspiration and expiration periods) of normal and abnormal candidates of each respiratory period in a test sample. In our new method, if one or more confident abnormal respiration phases are detected in a test respiration sample, the first method is used; otherwise, the second method is used for the classification. Our proposed method achieved significantly higher performance (88.6%) at the 5% level (p=0.027) than does each conventional classification method alone (80.6% and 84.9%). This validates our newly proposed classification method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信