面向人-聊天机器人交互的综合修复框架:以措辞改写为例

Alina Asisof
{"title":"面向人-聊天机器人交互的综合修复框架:以措辞改写为例","authors":"Alina Asisof","doi":"10.1145/3514197.3549641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.","PeriodicalId":149593,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a comprehensive repair framework for human-chatbot interaction: the case of rephrasing\",\"authors\":\"Alina Asisof\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3514197.3549641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514197.3549641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514197.3549641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聊天机器人正在成为服务产品的常规组成部分。然而,在人与聊天机器人的互动中,失败是很常见的,用适当的策略来减轻它们是对话的一个组成部分。例如,聊天机器人可以被设计成提示重新措辞,尽管由于用户反应的复杂性,这并不总是成功的。研究呼吁使用分类法对用户的反应进行分类,以计算有意义的反应,从而鼓励对话的继续。我们提出了一个基于先前研究的策略框架,并测试了其有效性,重点关注用户如何在对话回合中重新措辞。我们发现,用户通过改变单词数量、改变语法或使用同义词正式地重新表述问题(49%),在较小程度上通过改变信息值(25%)。我们建议按照这种行为训练聊天机器人,并设计更好的提示来指导用户的下一步行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a comprehensive repair framework for human-chatbot interaction: the case of rephrasing
Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信