Community Engagement in Co-designing an Innovative Health Equity Program: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION Community-based interprofessional education is a promising strategy for socializing students into team-based care and centering the voices of community members in health equity-focused work. Particularly in resource limited areas, it is vital to collaborate across institutions, professions, and constituents to plan and implement interprofessional education offerings. However, little is known about the factors that support the process of co-designing an interprofessional health equity program centering the community. METHODS Using a convergent, case study framework, this mixed methods project used quantitative data (Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory) and qualitative data from working group feedback forms, to evaluate our collaborative process. RESULTS Quantitative analysis reveals collaborative strengths that include skilled leadership, unique group purpose, and mutual respect. Collaborative challenges include appropriate cross-section of members and sufficient funds. Qualitative themes (analyzed to further illuminate quantitative results) include sense of purpose, importance of thoughtful leadership, and community engagement. DISCUSSION Building sustainable academic-hospital-community relationships and centering the community in health equity work are keys to success in co-designing an interprofessional health equity curriculum. Committed funding also supports sustainability and sends an important message about the value of community members and community-based work. While these recommendations may be common sense, they are not yet common practice.