{"title":"滚石公司诉摩尔斯蒂芬斯:不必要的纠缠","authors":"D. Halpern","doi":"10.1111/J.1468-2230.2010.00795.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The opinions of the minority risk creating a dangerous inroad into Salamon and Caparo. The opinions of the majority avoid that risk but reach the right result by tortuous reasoning. The answer to the case lies in a proper application of Caparo.","PeriodicalId":426546,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle\",\"authors\":\"D. Halpern\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1468-2230.2010.00795.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The opinions of the minority risk creating a dangerous inroad into Salamon and Caparo. The opinions of the majority avoid that risk but reach the right result by tortuous reasoning. The answer to the case lies in a proper application of Caparo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2230.2010.00795.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2230.2010.00795.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle
The opinions of the minority risk creating a dangerous inroad into Salamon and Caparo. The opinions of the majority avoid that risk but reach the right result by tortuous reasoning. The answer to the case lies in a proper application of Caparo.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
