{"title":"利用来自股票和信贷市场多个供应商的ESG数据","authors":"Arik Ben Dor, Jingling Guan, Xiaming Zeng","doi":"10.3905/jesg.2023.1.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investors’ interest in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations resulted in a large number of commercial providers offering firm-level ESG scores, which often differ, given the lack of a uniform and widely accepted definition of ESG. As a result, many investors try to identify the best provider, or develop their in-house scores. The authors look at how to efficiently leverage ESG data from multiple providers. They first discuss why it is important to standardize ESG scores across providers before taking an average, and they describe an algorithm to do so. Second, they show that the dispersion of ESG scores is useful beyond the average ESG levels. The authors find that ESG dispersions among providers can predict future returns in both stocks and corporate bonds even after controlling for the average ESG level and other systematic risk drivers. Their results suggest that investors would benefit from incorporating ESG rating dispersion in addition to the level of ESG rankings into their investment process.","PeriodicalId":213872,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging ESG Data from Multiple Providers in Equity and Credit Markets\",\"authors\":\"Arik Ben Dor, Jingling Guan, Xiaming Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jesg.2023.1.078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investors’ interest in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations resulted in a large number of commercial providers offering firm-level ESG scores, which often differ, given the lack of a uniform and widely accepted definition of ESG. As a result, many investors try to identify the best provider, or develop their in-house scores. The authors look at how to efficiently leverage ESG data from multiple providers. They first discuss why it is important to standardize ESG scores across providers before taking an average, and they describe an algorithm to do so. Second, they show that the dispersion of ESG scores is useful beyond the average ESG levels. The authors find that ESG dispersions among providers can predict future returns in both stocks and corporate bonds even after controlling for the average ESG level and other systematic risk drivers. Their results suggest that investors would benefit from incorporating ESG rating dispersion in addition to the level of ESG rankings into their investment process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2023.1.078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2023.1.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leveraging ESG Data from Multiple Providers in Equity and Credit Markets
Investors’ interest in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations resulted in a large number of commercial providers offering firm-level ESG scores, which often differ, given the lack of a uniform and widely accepted definition of ESG. As a result, many investors try to identify the best provider, or develop their in-house scores. The authors look at how to efficiently leverage ESG data from multiple providers. They first discuss why it is important to standardize ESG scores across providers before taking an average, and they describe an algorithm to do so. Second, they show that the dispersion of ESG scores is useful beyond the average ESG levels. The authors find that ESG dispersions among providers can predict future returns in both stocks and corporate bonds even after controlling for the average ESG level and other systematic risk drivers. Their results suggest that investors would benefit from incorporating ESG rating dispersion in addition to the level of ESG rankings into their investment process.