失去一个亲近的人——法律与心理学的交叉。波兰法律案例

Marlena Drapalska-Grochowicz
{"title":"失去一个亲近的人——法律与心理学的交叉。波兰法律案例","authors":"Marlena Drapalska-Grochowicz","doi":"10.18690/mls.16.1.87-122.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nThe Polish legislator allows for compensation for the harm suffered due to the death of close person resulting from a tort (for example, a car accident). The basis for such claims is Article 446 § 4 of the Polish Civil Code, which contains a vague expression “the closest family member.” Courts must therefore determine whether and how someone was close to someone. The language of the judicial justifications indicates that the courts do not determine proximity solely based on legal criteria. In this publication, I will analyze court decisions in which the scope of the vague expression “the closest family member” has been adjudicated. The analysis aims to establish the legal understanding of closeness in the indicated case and to determine whether and how references to psychology support it. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":227174,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, Law & Society","volume":"284 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Loss of a Close Person – Intersections Between Law and Psychology. Case of Polish Law\",\"authors\":\"Marlena Drapalska-Grochowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/mls.16.1.87-122.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\nThe Polish legislator allows for compensation for the harm suffered due to the death of close person resulting from a tort (for example, a car accident). The basis for such claims is Article 446 § 4 of the Polish Civil Code, which contains a vague expression “the closest family member.” Courts must therefore determine whether and how someone was close to someone. The language of the judicial justifications indicates that the courts do not determine proximity solely based on legal criteria. In this publication, I will analyze court decisions in which the scope of the vague expression “the closest family member” has been adjudicated. The analysis aims to establish the legal understanding of closeness in the indicated case and to determine whether and how references to psychology support it. \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":227174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine, Law & Society\",\"volume\":\"284 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine, Law & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/mls.16.1.87-122.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, Law & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/mls.16.1.87-122.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波兰立法者允许赔偿因侵权行为(例如,车祸)造成的近亲死亡所造成的伤害。这种主张的依据是波兰民法典第446条第4款,其中包含一个模糊的表述“最亲密的家庭成员”。因此,法院必须确定某人是否与某人关系密切,以及如何与某人关系密切。司法理由的语言表明,法院并不仅仅根据法律标准来确定接近性。在本出版物中,我将分析法院判决中模糊表达“最亲密的家庭成员”的范围。分析的目的是建立对指示案件中亲密性的法律理解,并确定是否以及如何引用心理学来支持它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Loss of a Close Person – Intersections Between Law and Psychology. Case of Polish Law
The Polish legislator allows for compensation for the harm suffered due to the death of close person resulting from a tort (for example, a car accident). The basis for such claims is Article 446 § 4 of the Polish Civil Code, which contains a vague expression “the closest family member.” Courts must therefore determine whether and how someone was close to someone. The language of the judicial justifications indicates that the courts do not determine proximity solely based on legal criteria. In this publication, I will analyze court decisions in which the scope of the vague expression “the closest family member” has been adjudicated. The analysis aims to establish the legal understanding of closeness in the indicated case and to determine whether and how references to psychology support it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信