{"title":"案件当事人行为不一致","authors":"N. Gribov","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-13-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dealing with the contradictory behavior of participants in the civil process. The author, based on an analysis of foreign and domestic legislation and the practice of its application, concludes that the two doctrines are used to indicate the prohibition of conflicting behavior: estoppel and venire contra factum proprium. These doctrines are different in their legal nature, although in modern Russian they are used as synonyms. Additionally, in this study the author identified elements of the prohibition of conflicting behavior and noted its difference from other similar legal institutes.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"518 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconsistent Behavior of Parties to a Case\",\"authors\":\"N. Gribov\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-13-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is dealing with the contradictory behavior of participants in the civil process. The author, based on an analysis of foreign and domestic legislation and the practice of its application, concludes that the two doctrines are used to indicate the prohibition of conflicting behavior: estoppel and venire contra factum proprium. These doctrines are different in their legal nature, although in modern Russian they are used as synonyms. Additionally, in this study the author identified elements of the prohibition of conflicting behavior and noted its difference from other similar legal institutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"518 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-13-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-13-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article is dealing with the contradictory behavior of participants in the civil process. The author, based on an analysis of foreign and domestic legislation and the practice of its application, concludes that the two doctrines are used to indicate the prohibition of conflicting behavior: estoppel and venire contra factum proprium. These doctrines are different in their legal nature, although in modern Russian they are used as synonyms. Additionally, in this study the author identified elements of the prohibition of conflicting behavior and noted its difference from other similar legal institutes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
