基于机器学习的脑电图信号处理的情绪行为分析:一个案例研究

Salim Klibi, M. Mestiri, I. Farah
{"title":"基于机器学习的脑电图信号处理的情绪行为分析:一个案例研究","authors":"Salim Klibi, M. Mestiri, I. Farah","doi":"10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a well-known benchmark, a comparison between the present study and the literature was carried out. This paper investigates a variety of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for classifying emotional events using EEG brainwave data. The contribution of this paper occurs in the data processing phase more precisely at the classification level to predict human emotions either positive, neutral, or negative from EEG signals after applying several algorithms and techniques. According to Bird’s findings, RF augmenting with InfoGain information outperforms Adaptative Boosted LSTM, Adaboosted MLP, and nonboosted DEvo MLP. During the classification phase, we used different classifiers such Random Forest (RF), XgBOOST, NaiveBayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Linear RegressionCV (LRCV), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Regression (LR), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to improve classification performance. They attained an overall accuracy of around 96,88%, 96,41%, 95,47%, 94,06%, 90,00%, 89,06%, 88,91%, and 52,66% respectively. As a result, we find that InfoGain consistently improves RF’s performance in dealing with data and outperforms other classifiers. On the other hand, the inefficiency of CNN can be explained by the lack of a big amount of data.","PeriodicalId":308802,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional behavior analysis based on EEG signal processing using Machine Learning: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Salim Klibi, M. Mestiri, I. Farah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a well-known benchmark, a comparison between the present study and the literature was carried out. This paper investigates a variety of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for classifying emotional events using EEG brainwave data. The contribution of this paper occurs in the data processing phase more precisely at the classification level to predict human emotions either positive, neutral, or negative from EEG signals after applying several algorithms and techniques. According to Bird’s findings, RF augmenting with InfoGain information outperforms Adaptative Boosted LSTM, Adaboosted MLP, and nonboosted DEvo MLP. During the classification phase, we used different classifiers such Random Forest (RF), XgBOOST, NaiveBayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Linear RegressionCV (LRCV), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Regression (LR), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to improve classification performance. They attained an overall accuracy of around 96,88%, 96,41%, 95,47%, 94,06%, 90,00%, 89,06%, 88,91%, and 52,66% respectively. As a result, we find that InfoGain consistently improves RF’s performance in dealing with data and outperforms other classifiers. On the other hand, the inefficiency of CNN can be explained by the lack of a big amount of data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基于一个众所周知的基准,本研究与文献进行了比较。本文研究了各种机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)算法,用于使用脑电波数据对情绪事件进行分类。本文的贡献发生在数据处理阶段,在分类层面上,通过应用多种算法和技术,更精确地从脑电图信号中预测人类的积极、中性或消极情绪。根据Bird的研究结果,使用InfoGain信息的RF增强优于自适应增强LSTM、自适应增强MLP和非增强DEvo MLP。在分类阶段,我们使用随机森林(RF)、XgBOOST、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、决策树(DT)、线性回归(LRCV)、支持向量机(SVM)、线性回归(LR)和卷积神经网络(CNN)等不同的分类器来提高分类性能。它们的总体准确率分别为96.88%、96.41%、95.47%、94,06%、9000%、89,06%、88,91%和52,66%。结果,我们发现InfoGain在处理数据方面不断提高RF的性能,并且优于其他分类器。另一方面,CNN的低效率可以用缺乏大量数据来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional behavior analysis based on EEG signal processing using Machine Learning: A case study
Based on a well-known benchmark, a comparison between the present study and the literature was carried out. This paper investigates a variety of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for classifying emotional events using EEG brainwave data. The contribution of this paper occurs in the data processing phase more precisely at the classification level to predict human emotions either positive, neutral, or negative from EEG signals after applying several algorithms and techniques. According to Bird’s findings, RF augmenting with InfoGain information outperforms Adaptative Boosted LSTM, Adaboosted MLP, and nonboosted DEvo MLP. During the classification phase, we used different classifiers such Random Forest (RF), XgBOOST, NaiveBayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Linear RegressionCV (LRCV), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Regression (LR), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to improve classification performance. They attained an overall accuracy of around 96,88%, 96,41%, 95,47%, 94,06%, 90,00%, 89,06%, 88,91%, and 52,66% respectively. As a result, we find that InfoGain consistently improves RF’s performance in dealing with data and outperforms other classifiers. On the other hand, the inefficiency of CNN can be explained by the lack of a big amount of data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信