在huac时代的好莱坞处理海地

A. G. Sepinwall
{"title":"在huac时代的好莱坞处理海地","authors":"A. G. Sepinwall","doi":"10.14325/mississippi/9781496833105.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Lydia Bailey (20th C.-Fox, 1952), Hollywood’s only film set during the Haitian Revolution. This romance-adventure hybrid (by Philip Dunne and Michael Blankfort) placed fictional white Americans alongside real figures such as Toussaint Louverture. Lydia Bailey was acclaimed in 1952 as a groundbreaking change in how Hollywood portrayed Black History. The chapter argues that Lydia Bailey, representing a particular moment in postwar and Cold War cinema, was antiracist and forward-thinking in many ways. It supported the idea of decolonization and justified the violence of Haitian revolutionaries against colonists seeking to reenslave them. Nevertheless, it contained stereotypes about Haiti and Blacks in general. The chapter also asks: How did House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) hearings affect the film’s production? How was it received by white and African American viewers in the U.S., and by audiences in Haiti, France and elsewhere? And why has it fallen into obscurity?","PeriodicalId":445834,"journal":{"name":"Slave Revolt on Screen","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handling Haiti in HUAC-Era Hollywood\",\"authors\":\"A. G. Sepinwall\",\"doi\":\"10.14325/mississippi/9781496833105.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter focuses on Lydia Bailey (20th C.-Fox, 1952), Hollywood’s only film set during the Haitian Revolution. This romance-adventure hybrid (by Philip Dunne and Michael Blankfort) placed fictional white Americans alongside real figures such as Toussaint Louverture. Lydia Bailey was acclaimed in 1952 as a groundbreaking change in how Hollywood portrayed Black History. The chapter argues that Lydia Bailey, representing a particular moment in postwar and Cold War cinema, was antiracist and forward-thinking in many ways. It supported the idea of decolonization and justified the violence of Haitian revolutionaries against colonists seeking to reenslave them. Nevertheless, it contained stereotypes about Haiti and Blacks in general. The chapter also asks: How did House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) hearings affect the film’s production? How was it received by white and African American viewers in the U.S., and by audiences in Haiti, France and elsewhere? And why has it fallen into obscurity?\",\"PeriodicalId\":445834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slave Revolt on Screen\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slave Revolt on Screen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496833105.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slave Revolt on Screen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496833105.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章的重点是莉迪亚·贝利(20世纪福克斯,1952年),好莱坞唯一一部以海地革命为背景的电影。这部由菲利普·邓恩(Philip Dunne)和迈克尔·布兰克福特(Michael Blankfort)创作的浪漫冒险混合体,将虚构的美国白人与杜桑·卢维杜尔(Toussaint Louverture)等真实人物放在一起。1952年,莉迪亚·贝利被誉为好莱坞刻画黑人历史的开创性变革。这一章认为莉迪亚·贝利代表了战后和冷战电影中的一个特殊时刻,她在很多方面都是反种族主义和前瞻性的。它支持非殖民化的想法,并为海地革命者对试图重新奴役他们的殖民者的暴力行为辩护。然而,它包含了对海地和一般黑人的刻板印象。这一章还问道:众议院非美活动委员会(HUAC)的听证会是如何影响电影的制作的?美国的白人和非裔美国观众,以及海地、法国和其他地方的观众对它的反应如何?为什么它变得默默无闻?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handling Haiti in HUAC-Era Hollywood
This chapter focuses on Lydia Bailey (20th C.-Fox, 1952), Hollywood’s only film set during the Haitian Revolution. This romance-adventure hybrid (by Philip Dunne and Michael Blankfort) placed fictional white Americans alongside real figures such as Toussaint Louverture. Lydia Bailey was acclaimed in 1952 as a groundbreaking change in how Hollywood portrayed Black History. The chapter argues that Lydia Bailey, representing a particular moment in postwar and Cold War cinema, was antiracist and forward-thinking in many ways. It supported the idea of decolonization and justified the violence of Haitian revolutionaries against colonists seeking to reenslave them. Nevertheless, it contained stereotypes about Haiti and Blacks in general. The chapter also asks: How did House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) hearings affect the film’s production? How was it received by white and African American viewers in the U.S., and by audiences in Haiti, France and elsewhere? And why has it fallen into obscurity?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信