有争议的公民身份:不再驱逐运动中的无证激进主义

Kathryn Abrams
{"title":"有争议的公民身份:不再驱逐运动中的无证激进主义","authors":"Kathryn Abrams","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines a key shift in the activism of undocumented immigrants: the move from pro-system, institutionally-focused politics to the more contentious, direct action politics of the Not1More Deportation campaign. I trace this shift by analyzing three dimensions of undocumented activism: the content of the narratives or experiential accounts shared by activists; the tactics utilized by DREAMers and community-based organizations of undocumented immigrants; and the strategies of emotion management and emotional performance adopted by activists. I argue that this move toward contentious politics was fueled by an iterative process of movement claims-making and institutional response, which both empowered undocumented activists and rendered them skeptical of reliance on formal institutions or political parties. This article draws on several years of empirical research with undocumented activists in the state of Arizona; it analyzes the Not1MoreDeportation campaign as it has occurred both in Arizona and nationwide.","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"253 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contentious Citizenship: Undocumented Activism in the Not1More Deportation Campaign\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Abrams\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38Z562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines a key shift in the activism of undocumented immigrants: the move from pro-system, institutionally-focused politics to the more contentious, direct action politics of the Not1More Deportation campaign. I trace this shift by analyzing three dimensions of undocumented activism: the content of the narratives or experiential accounts shared by activists; the tactics utilized by DREAMers and community-based organizations of undocumented immigrants; and the strategies of emotion management and emotional performance adopted by activists. I argue that this move toward contentious politics was fueled by an iterative process of movement claims-making and institutional response, which both empowered undocumented activists and rendered them skeptical of reliance on formal institutions or political parties. This article draws on several years of empirical research with undocumented activists in the state of Arizona; it analyzes the Not1MoreDeportation campaign as it has occurred both in Arizona and nationwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"253 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文考察了无证移民行动主义的一个关键转变:从支持制度、以制度为中心的政治转向更具争议性、更直接的行动政治——“不要再驱逐出境”运动。我通过分析无证行动主义的三个维度来追踪这种转变:活动家分享的叙述或经验叙述的内容;梦想者和无证移民社区组织使用的策略;积极分子的情绪管理和情绪表现策略。我认为,这种向争议性政治的转变是由运动主张和机构回应的反复过程推动的,这既赋予了无证件活动家权力,又使他们对依赖正式机构或政党持怀疑态度。本文借鉴了几年来对亚利桑那州无证激进分子的实证研究;它分析了在亚利桑那州和全国范围内发生的“不要再驱逐出境”运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contentious Citizenship: Undocumented Activism in the Not1More Deportation Campaign
This article examines a key shift in the activism of undocumented immigrants: the move from pro-system, institutionally-focused politics to the more contentious, direct action politics of the Not1More Deportation campaign. I trace this shift by analyzing three dimensions of undocumented activism: the content of the narratives or experiential accounts shared by activists; the tactics utilized by DREAMers and community-based organizations of undocumented immigrants; and the strategies of emotion management and emotional performance adopted by activists. I argue that this move toward contentious politics was fueled by an iterative process of movement claims-making and institutional response, which both empowered undocumented activists and rendered them skeptical of reliance on formal institutions or political parties. This article draws on several years of empirical research with undocumented activists in the state of Arizona; it analyzes the Not1MoreDeportation campaign as it has occurred both in Arizona and nationwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信