接口比较:SSA与FC-AL

IEEE Concurr. Pub Date : 1998-04-01 DOI:10.1109/4434.678818

D. Du, Tai-Sheng Chang, J. Hsieh, Yuewei Wang, Sangyup Shim

{"title":"接口比较:SSA与FC-AL","authors":"D. Du, Tai-Sheng Chang, J. Hsieh, Yuewei Wang, Sangyup Shim","doi":"10.1109/4434.678818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The serial storage architecture and fibre channel-arbitrated loop interfaces offer a simple cabling system, higher bandwidth, the ability to connect more than 100 disks, fault tolerance, and fair accesses on the channel. This article investigates the performance of these two emerging serial storage interfaces for fairness, latency, overhead and aggregate throughput under various traffic loads.","PeriodicalId":282630,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Concurr.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interface comparisons: SSA versus FC-AL\",\"authors\":\"D. Du, Tai-Sheng Chang, J. Hsieh, Yuewei Wang, Sangyup Shim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/4434.678818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The serial storage architecture and fibre channel-arbitrated loop interfaces offer a simple cabling system, higher bandwidth, the ability to connect more than 100 disks, fault tolerance, and fair accesses on the channel. This article investigates the performance of these two emerging serial storage interfaces for fairness, latency, overhead and aggregate throughput under various traffic loads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Concurr.\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Concurr.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/4434.678818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Concurr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/4434.678818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

串行存储体系结构和光纤通道仲裁环路接口提供了简单的布线系统、更高的带宽、连接100多个磁盘的能力、容错性和通道上的公平访问。本文研究了这两个新兴串行存储接口在各种流量负载下的公平性、延迟、开销和总吞吐量的性能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Interface comparisons: SSA versus FC-AL

The serial storage architecture and fibre channel-arbitrated loop interfaces offer a simple cabling system, higher bandwidth, the ability to connect more than 100 disks, fault tolerance, and fair accesses on the channel. This article investigates the performance of these two emerging serial storage interfaces for fairness, latency, overhead and aggregate throughput under various traffic loads.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

IEEE Concurr.

自引率

0.00%

发文量