法国公共政策对地方管理的考验

P. Warin
{"title":"法国公共政策对地方管理的考验","authors":"P. Warin","doi":"10.4324/9781351153089-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most political discourse today locally based management is analysed as an essential feature of effective and democratic public action, and an element of good governance principles determined at international level. It is seen as defining the questions to solve and the solutions required in every conceivable area of state intervention. Yet the principle of proximity is hardly anything new. Throughout history it has been rediscovered time and again, for the distance between governors and governed is essentially what characterizes political regimes (totalitarianism being the extreme form of overwhelming proximity). Nevertheless, over time the issues evolve and the subjects of debate change. The main issue is no longer the need for local democracy to transform a political-administrative system marked by limited debates on local issues, as it was thirty years ago; it is now the necessity for other modes of production of public policies, closer to the inhabitants of the territories concerned, with a view to increasing the effectiveness and transparency, and consequently the legitimacy, of public policies. That is why the principle of proximity is currently so successful. It encompasses everything from social action to security, health, transport, urban planning, consumption etc., as well as more recent and emblematic topics such as sustainable development or the social and solidarity economy. Since pragmatic solutions and transparent results have become the golden rules for good public management, the dominant discourse is the same everywhere: act in proximity.","PeriodicalId":237089,"journal":{"name":"Metropolitan Democracies","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting Locally Based Management to the Test in French Public Policy\",\"authors\":\"P. Warin\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351153089-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most political discourse today locally based management is analysed as an essential feature of effective and democratic public action, and an element of good governance principles determined at international level. It is seen as defining the questions to solve and the solutions required in every conceivable area of state intervention. Yet the principle of proximity is hardly anything new. Throughout history it has been rediscovered time and again, for the distance between governors and governed is essentially what characterizes political regimes (totalitarianism being the extreme form of overwhelming proximity). Nevertheless, over time the issues evolve and the subjects of debate change. The main issue is no longer the need for local democracy to transform a political-administrative system marked by limited debates on local issues, as it was thirty years ago; it is now the necessity for other modes of production of public policies, closer to the inhabitants of the territories concerned, with a view to increasing the effectiveness and transparency, and consequently the legitimacy, of public policies. That is why the principle of proximity is currently so successful. It encompasses everything from social action to security, health, transport, urban planning, consumption etc., as well as more recent and emblematic topics such as sustainable development or the social and solidarity economy. Since pragmatic solutions and transparent results have become the golden rules for good public management, the dominant discourse is the same everywhere: act in proximity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metropolitan Democracies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metropolitan Democracies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153089-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metropolitan Democracies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153089-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在今天的大多数政治论述中,以地方为基础的管理被分析为有效和民主的公共行动的基本特征,以及在国际一级确定的善治原则的一个要素。它被视为界定了要解决的问题,以及在每一个可以想象的国家干预领域需要解决的问题。然而,接近原则并不是什么新鲜事物。纵观历史,它被一次又一次地重新发现,因为统治者和被统治者之间的距离本质上是政治制度的特征(极权主义是压倒性接近的极端形式)。然而,随着时间的推移,问题不断演变,辩论的主题也发生了变化。主要问题不再是像30年前那样,需要地方民主来改变以对地方问题进行有限辩论为特征的政治行政体制;现在有必要采取更接近有关领土居民的其他公共政策制定方式,以期提高公共政策的有效性和透明度,从而提高其合法性。这就是接近原则目前如此成功的原因。它涵盖了从社会行动到安全、卫生、交通、城市规划、消费等各个方面,以及可持续发展或社会和团结经济等最近和具有象征意义的主题。由于务实的解决方案和透明的结果已成为良好公共管理的黄金法则,所以主导话语在任何地方都是一样的:就近行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting Locally Based Management to the Test in French Public Policy
In most political discourse today locally based management is analysed as an essential feature of effective and democratic public action, and an element of good governance principles determined at international level. It is seen as defining the questions to solve and the solutions required in every conceivable area of state intervention. Yet the principle of proximity is hardly anything new. Throughout history it has been rediscovered time and again, for the distance between governors and governed is essentially what characterizes political regimes (totalitarianism being the extreme form of overwhelming proximity). Nevertheless, over time the issues evolve and the subjects of debate change. The main issue is no longer the need for local democracy to transform a political-administrative system marked by limited debates on local issues, as it was thirty years ago; it is now the necessity for other modes of production of public policies, closer to the inhabitants of the territories concerned, with a view to increasing the effectiveness and transparency, and consequently the legitimacy, of public policies. That is why the principle of proximity is currently so successful. It encompasses everything from social action to security, health, transport, urban planning, consumption etc., as well as more recent and emblematic topics such as sustainable development or the social and solidarity economy. Since pragmatic solutions and transparent results have become the golden rules for good public management, the dominant discourse is the same everywhere: act in proximity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信