C2O:指导决策的工具

Alexander Nöhrer, Alexander Egyed
{"title":"C2O:指导决策的工具","authors":"Alexander Nöhrer, Alexander Egyed","doi":"10.1145/1858996.1859077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision models are widely used in software engineering to describe and restrict decision-making (e.g., deriving a product from a product-line). Since decisions are typically interdependent, conflicts during decision-making are inevitably reached when invalid combinations of decisions are made. Unfortunately, the current state-of-the-art provides little support for dealing with such conflicts. On the one hand, some conflicts can be avoided by providing more freedom in which order decisions are made (i.e., most important decisions first). On the other hand, conflicts are unavoidable at times and living with conflicts may be preferable over forcing the user to fix them right away - particularly, because fixing conflicts becomes easier the more is known about an user's intentions. This paper introduces the C2O (Configurator 2.0) tool for guided decision-making. The tool allows the user to answer questions in an arbitrary order - with and without the presence of conflicts. While giving users those freedoms, it still supports and guides them by 1) rearranging the order of questions according to their potential to minimize user input, 2) providing guidance to avoid follow-on conflicts, and 3) supporting users in fixing conflicts at a later time.","PeriodicalId":341489,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C2O: a tool for guided decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Nöhrer, Alexander Egyed\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1858996.1859077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision models are widely used in software engineering to describe and restrict decision-making (e.g., deriving a product from a product-line). Since decisions are typically interdependent, conflicts during decision-making are inevitably reached when invalid combinations of decisions are made. Unfortunately, the current state-of-the-art provides little support for dealing with such conflicts. On the one hand, some conflicts can be avoided by providing more freedom in which order decisions are made (i.e., most important decisions first). On the other hand, conflicts are unavoidable at times and living with conflicts may be preferable over forcing the user to fix them right away - particularly, because fixing conflicts becomes easier the more is known about an user's intentions. This paper introduces the C2O (Configurator 2.0) tool for guided decision-making. The tool allows the user to answer questions in an arbitrary order - with and without the presence of conflicts. While giving users those freedoms, it still supports and guides them by 1) rearranging the order of questions according to their potential to minimize user input, 2) providing guidance to avoid follow-on conflicts, and 3) supporting users in fixing conflicts at a later time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1858996.1859077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1858996.1859077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

决策模型在软件工程中广泛用于描述和限制决策(例如,从产品线派生产品)。由于决策通常是相互依赖的,因此当做出无效的决策组合时,决策过程中不可避免地会产生冲突。不幸的是,目前的先进技术为处理此类冲突提供了很少的支持。一方面,一些冲突可以通过提供更多的自由来避免,在这种自由中做出顺序决策(例如,最重要的决策优先)。另一方面,冲突有时是不可避免的,与冲突共存可能比强迫用户立即修复它们更可取——特别是,因为对用户的意图了解得越多,修复冲突就越容易。本文介绍了用于指导决策的C2O (Configurator 2.0)工具。该工具允许用户以任意顺序回答问题,无论是否存在冲突。在给予用户这些自由的同时,它仍然通过以下方式支持和指导用户:1)根据他们的潜力重新安排问题的顺序,以尽量减少用户的输入;2)提供指导以避免后续冲突;3)支持用户在以后的时间解决冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C2O: a tool for guided decision-making
Decision models are widely used in software engineering to describe and restrict decision-making (e.g., deriving a product from a product-line). Since decisions are typically interdependent, conflicts during decision-making are inevitably reached when invalid combinations of decisions are made. Unfortunately, the current state-of-the-art provides little support for dealing with such conflicts. On the one hand, some conflicts can be avoided by providing more freedom in which order decisions are made (i.e., most important decisions first). On the other hand, conflicts are unavoidable at times and living with conflicts may be preferable over forcing the user to fix them right away - particularly, because fixing conflicts becomes easier the more is known about an user's intentions. This paper introduces the C2O (Configurator 2.0) tool for guided decision-making. The tool allows the user to answer questions in an arbitrary order - with and without the presence of conflicts. While giving users those freedoms, it still supports and guides them by 1) rearranging the order of questions according to their potential to minimize user input, 2) providing guidance to avoid follow-on conflicts, and 3) supporting users in fixing conflicts at a later time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信