不正当商业行为指令:经济侵权救济?

C. Riefa, Séverine Saintier
{"title":"不正当商业行为指令:经济侵权救济?","authors":"C. Riefa, Séverine Saintier","doi":"10.4337/9781785365720.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the UCPD is to harmonise the laws on unfair commercial practices and with it bring adequate remedies for consumers victim of such practices. The text provided for maximum harmonisation, yet, the implementation raised considerable difficulty across Europe over the manner in which to transpose the text. One particular problem was that of enforceability which this chapter explores. While in the UK, the implementation appears to be positive some criticisms can be raised as to the application of the UTRs which come to fill a gap in the ‘tort family’ and simplifies actions to stop unfair commercial practices. In particular, the general approach of the UTRs in combatting unfair commercial practices is attractive compared to the ‘punctual approach’ of tort. It is important to note however that in the UK very few cases have been heard by the courts and thus only the tip of the iceberg seem to be taken care of. All cases also stem from administrative action and not yet from the right of private redress open to consumers. But it bodes well for any private action to see the way judges have received and used the UTRs. It is therefore possible to anticipate that the UTRs can remedy economic torts, should consumers be able to bring their cases to court. This of course is contentious given the restrictions imposed on the right of private action and the usual obstacles consumers face when trying to access justice.<br>","PeriodicalId":410319,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfair Commercial Practice Directive: Remedying Economic Torts?\",\"authors\":\"C. Riefa, Séverine Saintier\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781785365720.00019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the UCPD is to harmonise the laws on unfair commercial practices and with it bring adequate remedies for consumers victim of such practices. The text provided for maximum harmonisation, yet, the implementation raised considerable difficulty across Europe over the manner in which to transpose the text. One particular problem was that of enforceability which this chapter explores. While in the UK, the implementation appears to be positive some criticisms can be raised as to the application of the UTRs which come to fill a gap in the ‘tort family’ and simplifies actions to stop unfair commercial practices. In particular, the general approach of the UTRs in combatting unfair commercial practices is attractive compared to the ‘punctual approach’ of tort. It is important to note however that in the UK very few cases have been heard by the courts and thus only the tip of the iceberg seem to be taken care of. All cases also stem from administrative action and not yet from the right of private redress open to consumers. But it bodes well for any private action to see the way judges have received and used the UTRs. It is therefore possible to anticipate that the UTRs can remedy economic torts, should consumers be able to bring their cases to court. This of course is contentious given the restrictions imposed on the right of private action and the usual obstacles consumers face when trying to access justice.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":410319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365720.00019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365720.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《UCPD》的目的是协调有关不公平商业做法的法律,并为这些做法的消费者提供适当的补救措施。文本提供了最大限度的协调,然而,在整个欧洲的实施中,文本的转换方式带来了相当大的困难。一个特别的问题是本章探讨的可执行性问题。虽然在英国,实施情况似乎是积极的,但对于utr的适用可以提出一些批评,因为它填补了“侵权家庭”的空白,并简化了阻止不公平商业行为的行动。特别是,与侵权行为的“准时做法”相比,贸易代表机构在打击不公平商业行为方面的一般做法更具吸引力。然而,值得注意的是,在英国,法院审理的案件很少,因此似乎只有冰山一角得到了照顾。所有案件也都源于行政行为,而不是消费者享有的私人补救权利。但是,看到法官接受和使用utr的方式,对于任何私人行动来说都是一个好兆头。因此,可以预期,如果消费者能够将他们的案件诉诸法庭,贸易代表机构可以补救经济侵权行为。考虑到对私人诉讼权利的限制以及消费者在寻求司法公正时通常面临的障碍,这当然是有争议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unfair Commercial Practice Directive: Remedying Economic Torts?
The aim of the UCPD is to harmonise the laws on unfair commercial practices and with it bring adequate remedies for consumers victim of such practices. The text provided for maximum harmonisation, yet, the implementation raised considerable difficulty across Europe over the manner in which to transpose the text. One particular problem was that of enforceability which this chapter explores. While in the UK, the implementation appears to be positive some criticisms can be raised as to the application of the UTRs which come to fill a gap in the ‘tort family’ and simplifies actions to stop unfair commercial practices. In particular, the general approach of the UTRs in combatting unfair commercial practices is attractive compared to the ‘punctual approach’ of tort. It is important to note however that in the UK very few cases have been heard by the courts and thus only the tip of the iceberg seem to be taken care of. All cases also stem from administrative action and not yet from the right of private redress open to consumers. But it bodes well for any private action to see the way judges have received and used the UTRs. It is therefore possible to anticipate that the UTRs can remedy economic torts, should consumers be able to bring their cases to court. This of course is contentious given the restrictions imposed on the right of private action and the usual obstacles consumers face when trying to access justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信