宪法法院根据普遍适用原则对法律进行司法审查时未执行的裁决

Fadly Ikhsan Pradana
{"title":"宪法法院根据普遍适用原则对法律进行司法审查时未执行的裁决","authors":"Fadly Ikhsan Pradana","doi":"10.15294/islrev.v3i2.45660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian Constitutional Court was formed based on the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.. The Constitutional Court in giving decisions must be implemented and obeyed in general (erge omnes). However, there are still state officials who do not implement the Constitutional Court decisions. Based on the 2019 academic report issued by the Faculty of Law, Trisakti University, 22 percent did not carry out the decisions ordered by the Constitutional Court. The research method used by the author is normative juridical using library materials. There is a Constitutional Court Ruling that cannot be implemented, namely the imposition of Article 335 of the Criminal Code with an unpleasant phrase. Based on this, the provision has no binding law. The factor of the inability to implement the Constitutional Court decision is that there is no executing institution and support from political parties. It can be summarized that there is a need for an executor and given a clear time statement.","PeriodicalId":156893,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI YANG TIDAK DILAKSANAKAN DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG DITINJAU DARI ASAS ERGA OMNES\",\"authors\":\"Fadly Ikhsan Pradana\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/islrev.v3i2.45660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Indonesian Constitutional Court was formed based on the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.. The Constitutional Court in giving decisions must be implemented and obeyed in general (erge omnes). However, there are still state officials who do not implement the Constitutional Court decisions. Based on the 2019 academic report issued by the Faculty of Law, Trisakti University, 22 percent did not carry out the decisions ordered by the Constitutional Court. The research method used by the author is normative juridical using library materials. There is a Constitutional Court Ruling that cannot be implemented, namely the imposition of Article 335 of the Criminal Code with an unpleasant phrase. Based on this, the provision has no binding law. The factor of the inability to implement the Constitutional Court decision is that there is no executing institution and support from political parties. It can be summarized that there is a need for an executor and given a clear time statement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v3i2.45660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v3i2.45660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚宪法法院是根据1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法修正案成立的。宪法法院作出的决定必须得到执行和服从(erge omnes)。但是,仍然有一些国家官员不执行宪法法院的判决。根据特里萨克蒂大学法学院发布的2019年学术报告,22%的人没有执行宪法法院下令的决定。笔者采用的研究方法是规范司法利用图书馆资料。有一项不能执行的宪法法院裁决,即以令人不快的措辞强制执行《刑法》第335条。基于此,该条款没有法律约束力。宪法法院的判决无法执行的原因是没有执行机构和政党的支持。综上所述,需要一个遗嘱执行人,并给出一个明确的时间声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI YANG TIDAK DILAKSANAKAN DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG DITINJAU DARI ASAS ERGA OMNES
The Indonesian Constitutional Court was formed based on the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.. The Constitutional Court in giving decisions must be implemented and obeyed in general (erge omnes). However, there are still state officials who do not implement the Constitutional Court decisions. Based on the 2019 academic report issued by the Faculty of Law, Trisakti University, 22 percent did not carry out the decisions ordered by the Constitutional Court. The research method used by the author is normative juridical using library materials. There is a Constitutional Court Ruling that cannot be implemented, namely the imposition of Article 335 of the Criminal Code with an unpleasant phrase. Based on this, the provision has no binding law. The factor of the inability to implement the Constitutional Court decision is that there is no executing institution and support from political parties. It can be summarized that there is a need for an executor and given a clear time statement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信