物联网路由协议的性能比较

C. Thiagarajan, P. Samundiswary
{"title":"物联网路由协议的性能比较","authors":"C. Thiagarajan, P. Samundiswary","doi":"10.1109/ICSTSN57873.2023.10151577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the IoT is a rapidly growing field with enormous potential for innovation and impact on society. Intelligent interfaces are used by the things with unique identification which helps us to enable to build wireless bridge to connect the end to end user for social communication & various purposes. As the Internet of Things evolves day by day it is critical to explore novel routing protocols. The categories of routing protocols are purely based on its unique mechanism. According to the various mechanisms of the routing protocol, an IoT network can adapt a specific routing protocol to serve and route the data from one to the other end. Therefore it is necessary to design appropriate routing protocol to connect the different entities. This article analyses and compares the performance of Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Routing Protocol for Low Power & Lossy Networks (RPL). Further, the comparison is done for the various attributes such as throughput, Packet delivery ratio & average end-to-end delay. It is observed through the simulation results that the RPL routing protocol provides better console than the AODV mechanisms in terms of PDR & throughput.","PeriodicalId":325019,"journal":{"name":"2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for IoT\",\"authors\":\"C. Thiagarajan, P. Samundiswary\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTSN57873.2023.10151577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the IoT is a rapidly growing field with enormous potential for innovation and impact on society. Intelligent interfaces are used by the things with unique identification which helps us to enable to build wireless bridge to connect the end to end user for social communication & various purposes. As the Internet of Things evolves day by day it is critical to explore novel routing protocols. The categories of routing protocols are purely based on its unique mechanism. According to the various mechanisms of the routing protocol, an IoT network can adapt a specific routing protocol to serve and route the data from one to the other end. Therefore it is necessary to design appropriate routing protocol to connect the different entities. This article analyses and compares the performance of Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Routing Protocol for Low Power & Lossy Networks (RPL). Further, the comparison is done for the various attributes such as throughput, Packet delivery ratio & average end-to-end delay. It is observed through the simulation results that the RPL routing protocol provides better console than the AODV mechanisms in terms of PDR & throughput.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN57873.2023.10151577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN57873.2023.10151577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物联网是一个快速发展的领域,具有巨大的创新潜力和对社会的影响。智能接口是指具有唯一标识的事物所使用的接口,它可以帮助我们建立连接终端与终端用户的无线桥梁,以实现社会通信和各种目的。随着物联网的日益发展,探索新的路由协议至关重要。路由协议的分类完全基于其独特的机制。根据路由协议的各种机制,物联网网络可以适应特定的路由协议来服务和路由数据从一端到另一端。因此,有必要设计合适的路由协议来连接不同的实体。本文分析比较了自组织按需距离矢量(AODV)和低功耗损耗网络路由协议(RPL)的性能。此外,还比较了各种属性,如吞吐量、数据包传送率和平均端到端延迟。仿真结果表明,RPL路由协议在PDR和吞吐量方面优于AODV机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for IoT
the IoT is a rapidly growing field with enormous potential for innovation and impact on society. Intelligent interfaces are used by the things with unique identification which helps us to enable to build wireless bridge to connect the end to end user for social communication & various purposes. As the Internet of Things evolves day by day it is critical to explore novel routing protocols. The categories of routing protocols are purely based on its unique mechanism. According to the various mechanisms of the routing protocol, an IoT network can adapt a specific routing protocol to serve and route the data from one to the other end. Therefore it is necessary to design appropriate routing protocol to connect the different entities. This article analyses and compares the performance of Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Routing Protocol for Low Power & Lossy Networks (RPL). Further, the comparison is done for the various attributes such as throughput, Packet delivery ratio & average end-to-end delay. It is observed through the simulation results that the RPL routing protocol provides better console than the AODV mechanisms in terms of PDR & throughput.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信