开放数据的希望与恐惧:决定开放数据的障碍

Martin Beno, K. Figl, Jürgen Umbrich, A. Polleres
{"title":"开放数据的希望与恐惧:决定开放数据的障碍","authors":"Martin Beno, K. Figl, Jürgen Umbrich, A. Polleres","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, Open Data has gained considerable attention: a steady growth in the number of openly published datasets – mainly by governments and public administrations - can be observed as the demand for Open Data rises. However, many potential providers are still hesitant to open their datasets and at the same time users often face difficulties when attempting to use this data in practice. This indicates that there are still various barriers present both regarding usage and publishing of Open Data, but studies that systematically collect and assess these barriers regarding their impact are rare. Based on this observation we survey prior literature on barriers, and have developed a questionnaire aimed at both assessing the users and publishers views on obstacles regarding Open Data adoption. Using a sample of over 100 participants from Austria who completed our online survey, we draw conclusions about the relative importance of the barriers reported in the literature. The empirical findings presented in this study shall serve as a solid foundation for future research on the mitigation of Open Data barriers.","PeriodicalId":240391,"journal":{"name":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Data Hopes and Fears: Determining the Barriers of Open Data\",\"authors\":\"Martin Beno, K. Figl, Jürgen Umbrich, A. Polleres\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, Open Data has gained considerable attention: a steady growth in the number of openly published datasets – mainly by governments and public administrations - can be observed as the demand for Open Data rises. However, many potential providers are still hesitant to open their datasets and at the same time users often face difficulties when attempting to use this data in practice. This indicates that there are still various barriers present both regarding usage and publishing of Open Data, but studies that systematically collect and assess these barriers regarding their impact are rare. Based on this observation we survey prior literature on barriers, and have developed a questionnaire aimed at both assessing the users and publishers views on obstacles regarding Open Data adoption. Using a sample of over 100 participants from Austria who completed our online survey, we draw conclusions about the relative importance of the barriers reported in the literature. The empirical findings presented in this study shall serve as a solid foundation for future research on the mitigation of Open Data barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

近年来,开放数据获得了相当大的关注:随着对开放数据需求的增加,可以看到公开发布的数据集数量稳步增长——主要是由政府和公共管理部门发布的。然而,许多潜在的提供者仍然对开放他们的数据集犹豫不决,同时用户在尝试在实践中使用这些数据时经常面临困难。这表明在开放数据的使用和发布方面仍然存在各种障碍,但是系统地收集和评估这些障碍及其影响的研究很少。基于这一观察,我们调查了先前关于障碍的文献,并开发了一份问卷,旨在评估用户和出版商对开放数据采用障碍的看法。使用来自奥地利的100多名参与者完成了我们的在线调查,我们得出了关于文献中报道的障碍的相对重要性的结论。本研究中提出的实证研究结果将为未来关于减少开放数据壁垒的研究奠定坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open Data Hopes and Fears: Determining the Barriers of Open Data
In recent years, Open Data has gained considerable attention: a steady growth in the number of openly published datasets – mainly by governments and public administrations - can be observed as the demand for Open Data rises. However, many potential providers are still hesitant to open their datasets and at the same time users often face difficulties when attempting to use this data in practice. This indicates that there are still various barriers present both regarding usage and publishing of Open Data, but studies that systematically collect and assess these barriers regarding their impact are rare. Based on this observation we survey prior literature on barriers, and have developed a questionnaire aimed at both assessing the users and publishers views on obstacles regarding Open Data adoption. Using a sample of over 100 participants from Austria who completed our online survey, we draw conclusions about the relative importance of the barriers reported in the literature. The empirical findings presented in this study shall serve as a solid foundation for future research on the mitigation of Open Data barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信