测量了英国办公大楼空调的能耗和碳排放

I. Knight, Gavin Dunn
{"title":"测量了英国办公大楼空调的能耗和碳排放","authors":"I. Knight, Gavin Dunn","doi":"10.1191/0143624405bt111oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the EU Energy Performance in Buildings Directive imminent in 2006, attention is focusing on how to reduce carbon emissions from buildings in practice. This research was undertaken to try to establish some ‘real’ buildingbased figures for the energy performance of air-conditioning systems in UK office buildings. One of the major questions to be answered is whether chilled beam and ceiling systems really are more efficient than traditional air-conditioning systems when used in the real world.1,2 This paper presents findings of a two-year field monitoring study investigating the energy performance of airconditioning (AC) systems in UK office buildings. The findings shown in this paper include: 1) the cooling power demand for the various air-conditioning systems monitored; 2) comparison of national energy consumption and carbon emissions bench-marks to the monitored systems; 3) comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of reverse-cycle AC systems with traditional heating-only systems. The results show that chilled ceiling systems typically consume significantly less energy than the other generic AC types in the heating and cooling of office buildings. However, all the generic AC system types studied appeared capable of meeting current ‘good practice’ standards for energy use in the UK. Practical application: The work provides an insight into the energy performance achieved by real AC systems as operated in UK Offices. When the EC Energy Performance in Buildings Directive becomes law in January 2006 the practically achievable energy and emissions performance of building services will fall more sharply into focus for designers. It is hoped that this paper will provide information useful to both designers and operators of AC systems in the UK as they attempt to reduce the impact of AC systems on the environment.","PeriodicalId":272488,"journal":{"name":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measured energy consumption and carbon emissions of air-conditioning in UK office buildings\",\"authors\":\"I. Knight, Gavin Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1191/0143624405bt111oa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the EU Energy Performance in Buildings Directive imminent in 2006, attention is focusing on how to reduce carbon emissions from buildings in practice. This research was undertaken to try to establish some ‘real’ buildingbased figures for the energy performance of air-conditioning systems in UK office buildings. One of the major questions to be answered is whether chilled beam and ceiling systems really are more efficient than traditional air-conditioning systems when used in the real world.1,2 This paper presents findings of a two-year field monitoring study investigating the energy performance of airconditioning (AC) systems in UK office buildings. The findings shown in this paper include: 1) the cooling power demand for the various air-conditioning systems monitored; 2) comparison of national energy consumption and carbon emissions bench-marks to the monitored systems; 3) comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of reverse-cycle AC systems with traditional heating-only systems. The results show that chilled ceiling systems typically consume significantly less energy than the other generic AC types in the heating and cooling of office buildings. However, all the generic AC system types studied appeared capable of meeting current ‘good practice’ standards for energy use in the UK. Practical application: The work provides an insight into the energy performance achieved by real AC systems as operated in UK Offices. When the EC Energy Performance in Buildings Directive becomes law in January 2006 the practically achievable energy and emissions performance of building services will fall more sharply into focus for designers. It is hoped that this paper will provide information useful to both designers and operators of AC systems in the UK as they attempt to reduce the impact of AC systems on the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624405bt111oa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624405bt111oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

随着2006年欧盟建筑能源性能指令的实施,如何在实践中减少建筑的碳排放成为人们关注的焦点。这项研究的目的是试图建立一些“真实的”建筑为基础的数据,空调系统的能源性能在英国办公大楼。需要回答的一个主要问题是,在现实世界中,冷梁和天花板系统是否真的比传统的空调系统更有效。1,2本文介绍了一项为期两年的实地监测研究的结果,该研究调查了英国办公楼空调(AC)系统的能源性能。本文的研究结果包括:1)所监测的各种空调系统的冷却功率需求;2)国家能源消耗和碳排放基准与监测系统的比较;3)反循环交流系统与传统供热系统的能耗和碳排放比较。结果表明,在办公大楼的供暖和制冷中,冷热天花板系统通常比其他通用的交流系统消耗的能源要少得多。然而,所有被研究的通用空调系统类型似乎都能够满足目前英国能源使用的“良好实践”标准。实际应用:这项工作提供了对英国办事处运行的实际交流系统所取得的能源性能的深入了解。当2006年1月《欧盟建筑能源绩效指令》成为法律时,建筑设备实际可实现的能源和排放绩效将更加成为设计师关注的焦点。希望本文能够为英国空调系统的设计者和操作员提供有用的信息,因为他们试图减少空调系统对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measured energy consumption and carbon emissions of air-conditioning in UK office buildings
With the EU Energy Performance in Buildings Directive imminent in 2006, attention is focusing on how to reduce carbon emissions from buildings in practice. This research was undertaken to try to establish some ‘real’ buildingbased figures for the energy performance of air-conditioning systems in UK office buildings. One of the major questions to be answered is whether chilled beam and ceiling systems really are more efficient than traditional air-conditioning systems when used in the real world.1,2 This paper presents findings of a two-year field monitoring study investigating the energy performance of airconditioning (AC) systems in UK office buildings. The findings shown in this paper include: 1) the cooling power demand for the various air-conditioning systems monitored; 2) comparison of national energy consumption and carbon emissions bench-marks to the monitored systems; 3) comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of reverse-cycle AC systems with traditional heating-only systems. The results show that chilled ceiling systems typically consume significantly less energy than the other generic AC types in the heating and cooling of office buildings. However, all the generic AC system types studied appeared capable of meeting current ‘good practice’ standards for energy use in the UK. Practical application: The work provides an insight into the energy performance achieved by real AC systems as operated in UK Offices. When the EC Energy Performance in Buildings Directive becomes law in January 2006 the practically achievable energy and emissions performance of building services will fall more sharply into focus for designers. It is hoped that this paper will provide information useful to both designers and operators of AC systems in the UK as they attempt to reduce the impact of AC systems on the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信