一位著名的经济学家是否应该得到特殊的标准?评亚当·斯密学术

History of Economics Society Bulletin Pub Date : 1989-09-01 DOI:10.1017/S1042771600005925

S. Rashid

{"title":"一位著名的经济学家是否应该得到特殊的标准?评亚当·斯密学术","authors":"S. Rashid","doi":"10.1017/S1042771600005925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matters are not very much improved when we come to the historian who qualifies all this [oversimplification of Luther] by some such phrase as that “Luther, however, was of an essentially medieval cast of mind;” for this parenthetical homage to research is precisely the vice and the delusion of the whig historian. Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History","PeriodicalId":123974,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Famous Economist Deserve Special Standards? A Critical Note on Adam Smith Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"S. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1042771600005925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Matters are not very much improved when we come to the historian who qualifies all this [oversimplification of Luther] by some such phrase as that “Luther, however, was of an essentially medieval cast of mind;” for this parenthetical homage to research is precisely the vice and the delusion of the whig historian. Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History\",\"PeriodicalId\":123974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600005925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600005925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们谈到历史学家时，情况并没有得到很大的改善，他用“路德本质上是一种中世纪的思维方式”这样的话来限定这一切(对路德的过度简化)，因为这种对研究的附加敬意恰恰是辉格党历史学家的缺点和妄想。赫伯特·巴特菲尔德，辉格党对历史的解释

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does a Famous Economist Deserve Special Standards? A Critical Note on Adam Smith Scholarship

Matters are not very much improved when we come to the historian who qualifies all this [oversimplification of Luther] by some such phrase as that “Luther, however, was of an essentially medieval cast of mind;” for this parenthetical homage to research is precisely the vice and the delusion of the whig historian. Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

History of Economics Society Bulletin

自引率

0.00%

发文量