Suthasinee Jinarakpong, S. Punpruk, S. Kumseranee, Thirawat Sanitmuang, Nopphan Rattanasombattawee
{"title":"非金属管道安全运行的新型防火保温材料","authors":"Suthasinee Jinarakpong, S. Punpruk, S. Kumseranee, Thirawat Sanitmuang, Nopphan Rattanasombattawee","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23082-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is one of the solutions considered using instead of metal pipe to avoid the corrosion problem. As RTP is a non-metallic pipe that is subjected to damage or deformation when get fire. A protective fireproof system is required to protect RTP from cellulosic fire for at least 2 hours. and pipe surface temperature not over 82 °C per RTP specification and should be reusable and has a long service life.\n From the performance test results, there are two materials of PFP (Passive Fire Projection) that passed the requirement. One is intumescent (Composite fiber glass fabric with external polyurethane \"PU\" coating 0.7 mm.) and the other one is rockwool insulation (Reflective heat guard 3 mm. + Rockwool insulation 50 mm. + Aluminium 1 mm.). The rising of the surface temperature of the Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is in the acceptable criteria. The RTP pipe appearance is still in good condition. For PFP appearance, the intumescent will be damaged after burning while rockwool insulation is not changed and is reusable. In terms of material cost, the price of intumescent including material cost and installation cost is lower by about 20%. Both options are interesting and shall be considered again for usage purposes. Replacement of metal pipe with spoolable pipe with PFP has advantages in terms of low maintenance cost and higher corrosion resistance. The Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe with PFP can be installed on existing pipe support with enough space for inspection. This solution can eliminate the weak point of RTP and allows the application of RTP without pull through carbon steel pipe. The PFP rockwool insulation is a good option to protect pipeline damage from unpredictable fire with low material and installation costs.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Fireproof Insulation for Safe Operation of Non-Metallic Pipe\",\"authors\":\"Suthasinee Jinarakpong, S. Punpruk, S. Kumseranee, Thirawat Sanitmuang, Nopphan Rattanasombattawee\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23082-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is one of the solutions considered using instead of metal pipe to avoid the corrosion problem. As RTP is a non-metallic pipe that is subjected to damage or deformation when get fire. A protective fireproof system is required to protect RTP from cellulosic fire for at least 2 hours. and pipe surface temperature not over 82 °C per RTP specification and should be reusable and has a long service life.\\n From the performance test results, there are two materials of PFP (Passive Fire Projection) that passed the requirement. One is intumescent (Composite fiber glass fabric with external polyurethane \\\"PU\\\" coating 0.7 mm.) and the other one is rockwool insulation (Reflective heat guard 3 mm. + Rockwool insulation 50 mm. + Aluminium 1 mm.). The rising of the surface temperature of the Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is in the acceptable criteria. The RTP pipe appearance is still in good condition. For PFP appearance, the intumescent will be damaged after burning while rockwool insulation is not changed and is reusable. In terms of material cost, the price of intumescent including material cost and installation cost is lower by about 20%. Both options are interesting and shall be considered again for usage purposes. Replacement of metal pipe with spoolable pipe with PFP has advantages in terms of low maintenance cost and higher corrosion resistance. The Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe with PFP can be installed on existing pipe support with enough space for inspection. This solution can eliminate the weak point of RTP and allows the application of RTP without pull through carbon steel pipe. The PFP rockwool insulation is a good option to protect pipeline damage from unpredictable fire with low material and installation costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23082-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23082-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
增强热塑性塑料管材(RTP)是替代金属管材避免腐蚀问题的解决方案之一。由于RTP是一种非金属管道,在火灾中容易损坏或变形。需要一个保护性防火系统来保护RTP免受纤维素燃烧至少2小时。根据RTP规范,管道表面温度不超过82°C,应可重复使用,使用寿命长。从性能测试结果来看,有两种PFP (Passive Fire Projection)材料通过了要求。一种是膨胀型(复合纤维玻璃布外涂聚氨酯“PU”0.7 mm),另一种是岩棉保温(反射热罩3mm . +岩棉保温50mm . +铝1mm .)。增强热塑性管(RTP)表面温度的上升在可接受的范围内。RTP管外观仍然完好。对于PFP外观,燃烧后会损坏膨胀体,而岩棉保温不改变,可重复使用。在材料成本方面,膨胀的价格包括材料成本和安装成本降低了20%左右。这两种选择都很有趣,应该再次考虑使用目的。PFP用线轴管代替金属管具有维护成本低、耐腐蚀性能高等优点。带有PFP的增强热塑性管可以安装在现有的管道支架上,并有足够的空间进行检查。这种解决方案可以消除RTP的弱点,使RTP的应用不需要通过碳钢管进行拉拔。PFP岩棉保温材料是一种很好的选择,可以保护管道免受不可预测的火灾的损害,而且材料和安装成本都很低。
Innovative Fireproof Insulation for Safe Operation of Non-Metallic Pipe
Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is one of the solutions considered using instead of metal pipe to avoid the corrosion problem. As RTP is a non-metallic pipe that is subjected to damage or deformation when get fire. A protective fireproof system is required to protect RTP from cellulosic fire for at least 2 hours. and pipe surface temperature not over 82 °C per RTP specification and should be reusable and has a long service life.
From the performance test results, there are two materials of PFP (Passive Fire Projection) that passed the requirement. One is intumescent (Composite fiber glass fabric with external polyurethane "PU" coating 0.7 mm.) and the other one is rockwool insulation (Reflective heat guard 3 mm. + Rockwool insulation 50 mm. + Aluminium 1 mm.). The rising of the surface temperature of the Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe (RTP) is in the acceptable criteria. The RTP pipe appearance is still in good condition. For PFP appearance, the intumescent will be damaged after burning while rockwool insulation is not changed and is reusable. In terms of material cost, the price of intumescent including material cost and installation cost is lower by about 20%. Both options are interesting and shall be considered again for usage purposes. Replacement of metal pipe with spoolable pipe with PFP has advantages in terms of low maintenance cost and higher corrosion resistance. The Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe with PFP can be installed on existing pipe support with enough space for inspection. This solution can eliminate the weak point of RTP and allows the application of RTP without pull through carbon steel pipe. The PFP rockwool insulation is a good option to protect pipeline damage from unpredictable fire with low material and installation costs.