通过法院判决的棱镜在乌克兰的刑事程序中取得证据的适当程序

A. Anheleniuk
{"title":"通过法院判决的棱镜在乌克兰的刑事程序中取得证据的适当程序","authors":"A. Anheleniuk","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-134-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently in Ukraine, the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation have to to be improved, both in terms of their normative consolidation and the practice of application. Ways to improve criminal procedural activity should be planned taking into consideration the analysis of judicial practice, in particular the analysis of the evaluation of evidence in court for their relevance and admissibility. The purpose of the work is to improve the receipt of evidence in the criminal process of Ukraine in an appropriate manner, which will be a guarantee of their admissibility in court. The following methods were used: comparative – legal – to compare normative – legal regulations and court decisions relating to the recognition of evidence as appropriate and admissible in a particular criminal proceeding; formal-legal – to determine the decisions of the court concerning the evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings; methods of logical and systematic analysis – to develop an effective proposal to improve the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. Results. It is proposed to apply rapid tests to determine the drug substance during the detention of a person. In addition, it is proposed to ammend to Part 1 of Art. 233 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, which regulates the right to break into the house or other property of a person with the voluntary consent of the person who owns them. It is proposed to consolidate the legal status of such a consent in order to avoid ambiguity of interpretation of the concept of voluntariness in court, in particular voluntary consent should be written in the form of a statement by the person himself with the obligatory indication of the relevant object of penetration. Conclusions. The appropriate method of obtaining evidence involves compliance with the procedural order of investigative (interrogative) or procedural actions. An indication of the proper way to obtain evidence is the correct choice of a specific action or a set of actions necessary for a quality investigation of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":331578,"journal":{"name":"Social & Legal Studios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APPROPRIATE PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE THROUGH THE PRISM OF COURT DECISIONS\",\"authors\":\"A. Anheleniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-134-140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently in Ukraine, the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation have to to be improved, both in terms of their normative consolidation and the practice of application. Ways to improve criminal procedural activity should be planned taking into consideration the analysis of judicial practice, in particular the analysis of the evaluation of evidence in court for their relevance and admissibility. The purpose of the work is to improve the receipt of evidence in the criminal process of Ukraine in an appropriate manner, which will be a guarantee of their admissibility in court. The following methods were used: comparative – legal – to compare normative – legal regulations and court decisions relating to the recognition of evidence as appropriate and admissible in a particular criminal proceeding; formal-legal – to determine the decisions of the court concerning the evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings; methods of logical and systematic analysis – to develop an effective proposal to improve the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. Results. It is proposed to apply rapid tests to determine the drug substance during the detention of a person. In addition, it is proposed to ammend to Part 1 of Art. 233 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, which regulates the right to break into the house or other property of a person with the voluntary consent of the person who owns them. It is proposed to consolidate the legal status of such a consent in order to avoid ambiguity of interpretation of the concept of voluntariness in court, in particular voluntary consent should be written in the form of a statement by the person himself with the obligatory indication of the relevant object of penetration. Conclusions. The appropriate method of obtaining evidence involves compliance with the procedural order of investigative (interrogative) or procedural actions. An indication of the proper way to obtain evidence is the correct choice of a specific action or a set of actions necessary for a quality investigation of criminal proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social & Legal Studios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social & Legal Studios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-134-140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-134-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在乌克兰,在审判前调查期间取得证据的方法必须得到改进,无论是在规范巩固方面还是在适用的实践方面。在规划改进刑事诉讼活动的方法时,应考虑到对司法实践的分析,特别是对法庭上对证据的相关性和可采性的评价的分析。这项工作的目的是以适当的方式改进乌克兰刑事程序中证据的收集,这将是保证这些证据在法庭上可予受理的一项工作。使用了下列方法:比较-法律-比较规范性-法律条例和法院关于在特定刑事诉讼中承认适当和可接受的证据的决定;正式法律-决定法院关于刑事诉讼中证据评估的决定;逻辑和系统分析方法-制定一项有效的建议,以改进乌克兰审前调查期间获取证据的方法。结果。建议在拘留期间采用快速检测来确定毒品物质。此外,建议修正《乌克兰刑事诉讼法》第233条第1部分,该条规定了在房主自愿同意的情况下闯入他人房屋或其他财产的权利。建议巩固这种同意的法律地位,以避免法院对自愿概念的解释产生歧义,特别是自愿同意应以本人陈述的形式书写,并强制性地指出有关的渗透对象。结论。取得证据的适当方法包括遵守调查(讯问)或程序性行动的程序命令。取得证据的正确途径是正确选择一项具体诉讼或一套刑事诉讼质量调查所必需的诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
APPROPRIATE PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE THROUGH THE PRISM OF COURT DECISIONS
Recently in Ukraine, the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation have to to be improved, both in terms of their normative consolidation and the practice of application. Ways to improve criminal procedural activity should be planned taking into consideration the analysis of judicial practice, in particular the analysis of the evaluation of evidence in court for their relevance and admissibility. The purpose of the work is to improve the receipt of evidence in the criminal process of Ukraine in an appropriate manner, which will be a guarantee of their admissibility in court. The following methods were used: comparative – legal – to compare normative – legal regulations and court decisions relating to the recognition of evidence as appropriate and admissible in a particular criminal proceeding; formal-legal – to determine the decisions of the court concerning the evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings; methods of logical and systematic analysis – to develop an effective proposal to improve the methods of obtaining evidence during the pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. Results. It is proposed to apply rapid tests to determine the drug substance during the detention of a person. In addition, it is proposed to ammend to Part 1 of Art. 233 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, which regulates the right to break into the house or other property of a person with the voluntary consent of the person who owns them. It is proposed to consolidate the legal status of such a consent in order to avoid ambiguity of interpretation of the concept of voluntariness in court, in particular voluntary consent should be written in the form of a statement by the person himself with the obligatory indication of the relevant object of penetration. Conclusions. The appropriate method of obtaining evidence involves compliance with the procedural order of investigative (interrogative) or procedural actions. An indication of the proper way to obtain evidence is the correct choice of a specific action or a set of actions necessary for a quality investigation of criminal proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信