在动态定价过程中增加分岔

Shuixiu Lu, S. Oberst, Guoqiang Zhang, Zongwei Luo
{"title":"在动态定价过程中增加分岔","authors":"Shuixiu Lu, S. Oberst, Guoqiang Zhang, Zongwei Luo","doi":"10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Price information enables consumers to anticipate a price and to make purchasing decisions based on their price expectations, which are critical for agents with pricing decisions or price regulations. A company with pricing decisions can aim to optimise the short-term or the long-term revenue, each of which leads to different pricing strategies thereby different price expectations. Two key ingredients play important roles in the choosing of the short-term or the long-term optimisation objectives: the maximal revenue and the robustness of the chosen pricing strategy against market volatility. However the robustness is rarely identified in a volatile market. Here, we investigate the robustness of optimal pricing strategies with the short-term or long-term optimisation objectives through the analysis of nonlinear dynamics of price expectations. Bifurcation diagrams and period diagrams are introduced to compare the change in dynamics of the optomal pricing strategies. Our results highlight that period adding bifurcations occur during the dynamic pricing processes studied. These bifurcations would challenge the robustness of an optimal pricing strategy. The consideration of the long-term revenue allows a company to charge a higher price, which in turn increases the revenue. However, the consideration of the short-term revenue can reduce the occurrence of period adding bifurcations, contributing to a robust pricing strategy. For a company, this strategy is a robust guarantee of optimal revenue in a volatile market; for consumers, this strategy avoids rapid changes in price and reduce their dissatisfaction of price variations.","PeriodicalId":368382,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Period adding bifurcations in dynamic pricing processes\",\"authors\":\"Shuixiu Lu, S. Oberst, Guoqiang Zhang, Zongwei Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Price information enables consumers to anticipate a price and to make purchasing decisions based on their price expectations, which are critical for agents with pricing decisions or price regulations. A company with pricing decisions can aim to optimise the short-term or the long-term revenue, each of which leads to different pricing strategies thereby different price expectations. Two key ingredients play important roles in the choosing of the short-term or the long-term optimisation objectives: the maximal revenue and the robustness of the chosen pricing strategy against market volatility. However the robustness is rarely identified in a volatile market. Here, we investigate the robustness of optimal pricing strategies with the short-term or long-term optimisation objectives through the analysis of nonlinear dynamics of price expectations. Bifurcation diagrams and period diagrams are introduced to compare the change in dynamics of the optomal pricing strategies. Our results highlight that period adding bifurcations occur during the dynamic pricing processes studied. These bifurcations would challenge the robustness of an optimal pricing strategy. The consideration of the long-term revenue allows a company to charge a higher price, which in turn increases the revenue. However, the consideration of the short-term revenue can reduce the occurrence of period adding bifurcations, contributing to a robust pricing strategy. For a company, this strategy is a robust guarantee of optimal revenue in a volatile market; for consumers, this strategy avoids rapid changes in price and reduce their dissatisfaction of price variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

价格信息使消费者能够预测价格,并根据他们的价格预期做出购买决策,这对制定定价决策或价格法规的代理至关重要。定价决策的公司可以以优化短期或长期收入为目标,每种目标都会导致不同的定价策略,从而导致不同的价格预期。在选择短期或长期优化目标时,有两个关键因素发挥着重要作用:最大收入和所选择的定价策略对市场波动的稳健性。然而,在动荡的市场中,这种稳健性很少得到证实。本文通过对价格预期的非线性动态分析,研究了短期或长期优化目标下最优定价策略的鲁棒性。引入分岔图和周期图来比较最优定价策略的动态变化。我们的研究结果强调了在研究的动态定价过程中出现的周期添加分岔。这些分歧将挑战最优定价策略的稳健性。考虑到长期收入,公司可以收取更高的价格,从而增加收入。然而,考虑短期收益可以减少增期分岔的发生,有助于制定稳健的定价策略。对于一家公司来说,这种策略是在动荡的市场中获得最佳收益的有力保证;对于消费者来说,这种策略避免了价格的快速变化,减少了消费者对价格变化的不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Period adding bifurcations in dynamic pricing processes
Price information enables consumers to anticipate a price and to make purchasing decisions based on their price expectations, which are critical for agents with pricing decisions or price regulations. A company with pricing decisions can aim to optimise the short-term or the long-term revenue, each of which leads to different pricing strategies thereby different price expectations. Two key ingredients play important roles in the choosing of the short-term or the long-term optimisation objectives: the maximal revenue and the robustness of the chosen pricing strategy against market volatility. However the robustness is rarely identified in a volatile market. Here, we investigate the robustness of optimal pricing strategies with the short-term or long-term optimisation objectives through the analysis of nonlinear dynamics of price expectations. Bifurcation diagrams and period diagrams are introduced to compare the change in dynamics of the optomal pricing strategies. Our results highlight that period adding bifurcations occur during the dynamic pricing processes studied. These bifurcations would challenge the robustness of an optimal pricing strategy. The consideration of the long-term revenue allows a company to charge a higher price, which in turn increases the revenue. However, the consideration of the short-term revenue can reduce the occurrence of period adding bifurcations, contributing to a robust pricing strategy. For a company, this strategy is a robust guarantee of optimal revenue in a volatile market; for consumers, this strategy avoids rapid changes in price and reduce their dissatisfaction of price variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信