一些可能的非线性指标的实验评价

T. Bigelow, W. O’Brien
{"title":"一些可能的非线性指标的实验评价","authors":"T. Bigelow, W. O’Brien","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to regulatory reasons, the output levels of ultrasound sources for use in medical applications must be known. Currently, this is done by making focal pressure measurements for a very large number of drive voltage amplitudes and then linearly derating the measured pressure levels. In order to reduce calibration times, some have proposed to linearly extrapolate pressures rather than perform direct measurements. However, nonlinear propagation effects corrupt the linear extrapolation and derating procedure. Thus, a reliable indicator of nonlinearity is needed to identify when linear extrapolation/derating would be valid. In this study, eight different nonlinearity indicators were evaluated experimentally in terms of their correspondence to the linear extrapolation error. Spherically focused ultrasound transducers were selected and excited to test the indicators sensitivity to frequency (3 - 8 MHz), f/# (1 and 2), transducer diameter (1.905 and 5.08 cm), pulse duration (1 and 3 cycles), and pulse phase (0/spl deg/ and 180/spl deg/). None of the eight nonlinearity indicators yielded consistent results. The lack of consistency resulted from the competing effects of nonlinear absorption and asymmetric distortion, which have yet to be combined into a unified theory.","PeriodicalId":378705,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluation of some possible nonlinearity indicators\",\"authors\":\"T. Bigelow, W. O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to regulatory reasons, the output levels of ultrasound sources for use in medical applications must be known. Currently, this is done by making focal pressure measurements for a very large number of drive voltage amplitudes and then linearly derating the measured pressure levels. In order to reduce calibration times, some have proposed to linearly extrapolate pressures rather than perform direct measurements. However, nonlinear propagation effects corrupt the linear extrapolation and derating procedure. Thus, a reliable indicator of nonlinearity is needed to identify when linear extrapolation/derating would be valid. In this study, eight different nonlinearity indicators were evaluated experimentally in terms of their correspondence to the linear extrapolation error. Spherically focused ultrasound transducers were selected and excited to test the indicators sensitivity to frequency (3 - 8 MHz), f/# (1 and 2), transducer diameter (1.905 and 5.08 cm), pulse duration (1 and 3 cycles), and pulse phase (0/spl deg/ and 180/spl deg/). None of the eight nonlinearity indicators yielded consistent results. The lack of consistency resulted from the competing effects of nonlinear absorption and asymmetric distortion, which have yet to be combined into a unified theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于监管原因,必须知道用于医疗应用的超声源的输出水平。目前,这是通过对大量驱动电压幅值进行焦点压力测量,然后将测量的压力水平线性降额来实现的。为了减少校准时间,有些人建议线性外推压力,而不是进行直接测量。然而,非线性传播效应破坏了线性外推和降额过程。因此,需要一个可靠的非线性指标来确定线性外推/降额何时有效。在这项研究中,八个不同的非线性指标在实验方面评估其对应的线性外推误差。选取球形聚焦超声换能器进行激励,测试其对频率(3 ~ 8 MHz)、f/#(1和2)、换能器直径(1.905和5.08 cm)、脉冲持续时间(1和3个周期)和脉冲相位(0/声压度/和180/声压度/)的灵敏度。八个非线性指标中没有一个产生一致的结果。缺乏一致性是由于非线性吸收和不对称畸变的相互竞争的影响,这还没有被结合成一个统一的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental evaluation of some possible nonlinearity indicators
Due to regulatory reasons, the output levels of ultrasound sources for use in medical applications must be known. Currently, this is done by making focal pressure measurements for a very large number of drive voltage amplitudes and then linearly derating the measured pressure levels. In order to reduce calibration times, some have proposed to linearly extrapolate pressures rather than perform direct measurements. However, nonlinear propagation effects corrupt the linear extrapolation and derating procedure. Thus, a reliable indicator of nonlinearity is needed to identify when linear extrapolation/derating would be valid. In this study, eight different nonlinearity indicators were evaluated experimentally in terms of their correspondence to the linear extrapolation error. Spherically focused ultrasound transducers were selected and excited to test the indicators sensitivity to frequency (3 - 8 MHz), f/# (1 and 2), transducer diameter (1.905 and 5.08 cm), pulse duration (1 and 3 cycles), and pulse phase (0/spl deg/ and 180/spl deg/). None of the eight nonlinearity indicators yielded consistent results. The lack of consistency resulted from the competing effects of nonlinear absorption and asymmetric distortion, which have yet to be combined into a unified theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信