克隆对维护有害吗?

S. Jarzabek, Yinxing Xue
{"title":"克隆对维护有害吗?","authors":"S. Jarzabek, Yinxing Xue","doi":"10.1145/1808901.1808911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We often find clones in semantically related programs parts. This semantic relationship, not clones, is a prime reason for maintenance problems, as semantically related program parts must be changed in sync no matter of clones.\n Only clones resulting from bad design hinder program maintainability. Long-lived essential clones that should not or cannot be eliminated are mostly neutral in respect to maintenance effort, and in some cases even help in maintenance. On the other hand, the presence of such clones signifies program parts that often are more difficult to maintain than clone-free parts.","PeriodicalId":374295,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Clones","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are clones harmful for maintenance?\",\"authors\":\"S. Jarzabek, Yinxing Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1808901.1808911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We often find clones in semantically related programs parts. This semantic relationship, not clones, is a prime reason for maintenance problems, as semantically related program parts must be changed in sync no matter of clones.\\n Only clones resulting from bad design hinder program maintainability. Long-lived essential clones that should not or cannot be eliminated are mostly neutral in respect to maintenance effort, and in some cases even help in maintenance. On the other hand, the presence of such clones signifies program parts that often are more difficult to maintain than clone-free parts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Software Clones\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Software Clones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1808901.1808911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Software Clones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1808901.1808911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

我们经常在语义相关的程序部分中发现克隆。这种语义关系(而不是克隆)是维护问题的主要原因,因为无论是否存在克隆,与语义相关的程序部分都必须同步更改。只有糟糕的设计导致的克隆才会阻碍程序的可维护性。不应该或不能消除的长期存在的基本克隆在维护工作方面大多是中性的,在某些情况下甚至有助于维护。另一方面,这种克隆的存在意味着程序部分通常比无克隆的部分更难维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are clones harmful for maintenance?
We often find clones in semantically related programs parts. This semantic relationship, not clones, is a prime reason for maintenance problems, as semantically related program parts must be changed in sync no matter of clones. Only clones resulting from bad design hinder program maintainability. Long-lived essential clones that should not or cannot be eliminated are mostly neutral in respect to maintenance effort, and in some cases even help in maintenance. On the other hand, the presence of such clones signifies program parts that often are more difficult to maintain than clone-free parts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信