移动设备上的生物识别认证:对用户努力、错误和任务中断的研究

Shari Trewin, C. Swart, Larry Koved, Jacquelyn Martino, Kapil Singh, Shay Ben-David
{"title":"移动设备上的生物识别认证:对用户努力、错误和任务中断的研究","authors":"Shari Trewin, C. Swart, Larry Koved, Jacquelyn Martino, Kapil Singh, Shay Ben-David","doi":"10.1145/2420950.2420976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine three biometric authentication modalities -- voice, face and gesture -- as well as password entry, on a mobile device, to explore the relative demands on user time, effort, error and task disruption. Our laboratory study provided observations of user actions, strategies, and reactions to the authentication methods. Face and voice biometrics conditions were faster than password entry. Speaking a PIN was the fastest for biometric sample entry, but short-term memory recall was better in the face verification condition. None of the authentication conditions were considered very usable. In conditions that combined two biometric entry methods, the time to acquire the biometric samples was shorter than if acquired separately but they were very unpopular and had high memory task error rates. These quantitative results demonstrate cognitive and motor differences between biometric authentication modalities, and inform policy decisions in selecting authentication methods.","PeriodicalId":397003,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"146","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biometric authentication on a mobile device: a study of user effort, error and task disruption\",\"authors\":\"Shari Trewin, C. Swart, Larry Koved, Jacquelyn Martino, Kapil Singh, Shay Ben-David\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2420950.2420976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine three biometric authentication modalities -- voice, face and gesture -- as well as password entry, on a mobile device, to explore the relative demands on user time, effort, error and task disruption. Our laboratory study provided observations of user actions, strategies, and reactions to the authentication methods. Face and voice biometrics conditions were faster than password entry. Speaking a PIN was the fastest for biometric sample entry, but short-term memory recall was better in the face verification condition. None of the authentication conditions were considered very usable. In conditions that combined two biometric entry methods, the time to acquire the biometric samples was shorter than if acquired separately but they were very unpopular and had high memory task error rates. These quantitative results demonstrate cognitive and motor differences between biometric authentication modalities, and inform policy decisions in selecting authentication methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":397003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"146\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2420950.2420976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2420950.2420976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 146

摘要

我们研究了三种生物识别认证模式-语音,面部和手势-以及密码输入,在移动设备上,探索对用户时间,精力,错误和任务中断的相对需求。我们的实验室研究提供了对用户行为、策略和对认证方法的反应的观察。面部和声音生物识别条件比密码输入快。在生物识别样本输入中,说出个人识别码是最快的,但在面部验证条件下,短期记忆的回忆效果更好。没有一个身份验证条件被认为非常有用。在结合两种生物特征输入方法的条件下,获取生物特征样本的时间比单独获取的时间短,但它们非常不受欢迎,并且具有较高的记忆任务错误率。这些定量结果证明了生物识别认证方式之间的认知和运动差异,并为选择认证方法的政策决策提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biometric authentication on a mobile device: a study of user effort, error and task disruption
We examine three biometric authentication modalities -- voice, face and gesture -- as well as password entry, on a mobile device, to explore the relative demands on user time, effort, error and task disruption. Our laboratory study provided observations of user actions, strategies, and reactions to the authentication methods. Face and voice biometrics conditions were faster than password entry. Speaking a PIN was the fastest for biometric sample entry, but short-term memory recall was better in the face verification condition. None of the authentication conditions were considered very usable. In conditions that combined two biometric entry methods, the time to acquire the biometric samples was shorter than if acquired separately but they were very unpopular and had high memory task error rates. These quantitative results demonstrate cognitive and motor differences between biometric authentication modalities, and inform policy decisions in selecting authentication methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信