我们该如何玩游戏?网络战争游戏的博弈理论模型

Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Krügel, G. Vigna, David Brumley
{"title":"我们该如何玩游戏?网络战争游戏的博弈理论模型","authors":"Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Krügel, G. Vigna, David Brumley","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2017.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated techniques and tools for finding, exploiting and patching vulnerabilities are maturing. In order to achieve an end goal such as winning a cyber-battle, these techniques and tools must be wielded strategically. Currently, strategy development in cyber - even with automated tools - is done manually, and is a bottleneck in practice. In this paper, we apply game theory toward the augmentation of the human decision-making process.,,Our work makes two novel contributions. First, previous work is limited by strong assumptions regarding the number of actors, actions, and choices in cyber-warfare. We develop a novel model of cyber-warfare that is more comprehensive than previous work, removing these limitations in the process. Second, we present an algorithm for calculating the optimal strategy of the players in our model. We show that our model is capable of finding better solutions than previous work within seconds, making computer-time strategic reasoning a reality. We also provide new insights, compared to previous models, on the impact of optimal strategies.","PeriodicalId":269696,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Shall We Play a Game?: A Game-theoretical Model for Cyber-warfare Games\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Krügel, G. Vigna, David Brumley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSF.2017.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated techniques and tools for finding, exploiting and patching vulnerabilities are maturing. In order to achieve an end goal such as winning a cyber-battle, these techniques and tools must be wielded strategically. Currently, strategy development in cyber - even with automated tools - is done manually, and is a bottleneck in practice. In this paper, we apply game theory toward the augmentation of the human decision-making process.,,Our work makes two novel contributions. First, previous work is limited by strong assumptions regarding the number of actors, actions, and choices in cyber-warfare. We develop a novel model of cyber-warfare that is more comprehensive than previous work, removing these limitations in the process. Second, we present an algorithm for calculating the optimal strategy of the players in our model. We show that our model is capable of finding better solutions than previous work within seconds, making computer-time strategic reasoning a reality. We also provide new insights, compared to previous models, on the impact of optimal strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2017.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2017.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

用于发现、利用和修补漏洞的自动化技术和工具正在成熟。为了达到最终目标,比如赢得一场网络战争,这些技术和工具必须有策略地使用。目前,网络战略开发——即使使用自动化工具——也是手工完成的,这在实践中是一个瓶颈。本文将博弈论应用于人类决策过程的增强。我们的工作有两个新的贡献。首先,先前的工作受到关于网络战争中参与者、行动和选择数量的强烈假设的限制。我们开发了一种新的网络战模型,比以前的工作更全面,消除了过程中的这些限制。其次,我们提出了一种算法来计算模型中参与者的最优策略。我们表明,我们的模型能够在几秒钟内找到比以前更好的解决方案,使计算机时间的战略推理成为现实。与以前的模型相比,我们还提供了关于最优策略影响的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Shall We Play a Game?: A Game-theoretical Model for Cyber-warfare Games
Automated techniques and tools for finding, exploiting and patching vulnerabilities are maturing. In order to achieve an end goal such as winning a cyber-battle, these techniques and tools must be wielded strategically. Currently, strategy development in cyber - even with automated tools - is done manually, and is a bottleneck in practice. In this paper, we apply game theory toward the augmentation of the human decision-making process.,,Our work makes two novel contributions. First, previous work is limited by strong assumptions regarding the number of actors, actions, and choices in cyber-warfare. We develop a novel model of cyber-warfare that is more comprehensive than previous work, removing these limitations in the process. Second, we present an algorithm for calculating the optimal strategy of the players in our model. We show that our model is capable of finding better solutions than previous work within seconds, making computer-time strategic reasoning a reality. We also provide new insights, compared to previous models, on the impact of optimal strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信