是什么让《创世纪64》如此重要?

{"title":"是什么让《创世纪64》如此重要?","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110687552-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a fact that someone shot the unarmed tenants of Budapest’s Csengery Street 64 on the night of October 15, 1944. It is also a fact that the Budapest People’s Tribunal sentenced Piroska Dely, a notorious “Arrow Cross woman” to death for the massacre. The Budapest press covered the case as the first massacre committed by Arrow Cross Party members. The key questions however remain unresolved: whether Piroska Dely was the murderer and whether she was a member of the Arrow Cross. The people’s tribunal trial did not identify the perpetrators with certainty; and since the analysis of witness statements leads to different conclusions this book will not offer definite answers either. Its aims are different. Firstly, the examination of the Csengery Street massacre can shed light on a part of Hungarian past that is still a subject of political and scholarly debates. Doing so is particularly pertinent today. Since Hungary’s recent populist turn, history writing increasingly focuses on simple people as central actors of history, while it simultaneously neglects methodological challenges in order to legitimize particular political goals and undermine the legitimacy of post-war political justice.32 The chronology of the October 15, 1944 events at Csengery 64 can be reconstructed fairly well, as there are many although often contradictory sources. The chronology in the appendix (see appendix 1, 2 and 3) provides a framework that makes the event straightforwardly narratable and hopefully relatable and understandable too. As Pierre Nora holds:","PeriodicalId":127235,"journal":{"name":"The Forgotten Massacre","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 What makes Csengery 64 important?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110687552-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a fact that someone shot the unarmed tenants of Budapest’s Csengery Street 64 on the night of October 15, 1944. It is also a fact that the Budapest People’s Tribunal sentenced Piroska Dely, a notorious “Arrow Cross woman” to death for the massacre. The Budapest press covered the case as the first massacre committed by Arrow Cross Party members. The key questions however remain unresolved: whether Piroska Dely was the murderer and whether she was a member of the Arrow Cross. The people’s tribunal trial did not identify the perpetrators with certainty; and since the analysis of witness statements leads to different conclusions this book will not offer definite answers either. Its aims are different. Firstly, the examination of the Csengery Street massacre can shed light on a part of Hungarian past that is still a subject of political and scholarly debates. Doing so is particularly pertinent today. Since Hungary’s recent populist turn, history writing increasingly focuses on simple people as central actors of history, while it simultaneously neglects methodological challenges in order to legitimize particular political goals and undermine the legitimacy of post-war political justice.32 The chronology of the October 15, 1944 events at Csengery 64 can be reconstructed fairly well, as there are many although often contradictory sources. The chronology in the appendix (see appendix 1, 2 and 3) provides a framework that makes the event straightforwardly narratable and hopefully relatable and understandable too. As Pierre Nora holds:\",\"PeriodicalId\":127235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Forgotten Massacre\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Forgotten Massacre\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110687552-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Forgotten Massacre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110687552-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1944年10月15日晚上,有人枪杀了布达佩斯圣杰里街64号手无寸铁的房客,这是事实。布达佩斯人民法庭因大屠杀判处臭名昭著的“箭十字女”Piroska Dely死刑,这也是事实。布达佩斯的报纸报道说,这是箭十字党成员犯下的第一起大屠杀。然而,关键的问题仍然没有解决:皮罗斯卡·德利是否是凶手,以及她是否是箭十字会的成员。人民法庭的审判没有确定罪犯的身份;由于对证人陈述的分析会得出不同的结论,本书也不会给出明确的答案。它的目标是不同的。首先,对圣杰里街大屠杀的审查可以揭示匈牙利过去的一部分,这仍然是政治和学术辩论的主题。这样做在今天尤为重要。32 .自从匈牙利最近的民粹主义转向以来,历史写作越来越关注简单的人作为历史的中心角色,同时忽略了方法论上的挑战,以使特定的政治目标合法化,并破坏战后政治正义的合法性1944年10月15日在圣吉吉64号发生的事件的年表可以相当好地重建,因为有许多尽管经常相互矛盾的来源。附录中的年表(参见附录1、2和3)提供了一个框架,使事件能够直接叙述,并希望能够产生关联和理解。正如皮埃尔·诺拉所说:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2 What makes Csengery 64 important?
It is a fact that someone shot the unarmed tenants of Budapest’s Csengery Street 64 on the night of October 15, 1944. It is also a fact that the Budapest People’s Tribunal sentenced Piroska Dely, a notorious “Arrow Cross woman” to death for the massacre. The Budapest press covered the case as the first massacre committed by Arrow Cross Party members. The key questions however remain unresolved: whether Piroska Dely was the murderer and whether she was a member of the Arrow Cross. The people’s tribunal trial did not identify the perpetrators with certainty; and since the analysis of witness statements leads to different conclusions this book will not offer definite answers either. Its aims are different. Firstly, the examination of the Csengery Street massacre can shed light on a part of Hungarian past that is still a subject of political and scholarly debates. Doing so is particularly pertinent today. Since Hungary’s recent populist turn, history writing increasingly focuses on simple people as central actors of history, while it simultaneously neglects methodological challenges in order to legitimize particular political goals and undermine the legitimacy of post-war political justice.32 The chronology of the October 15, 1944 events at Csengery 64 can be reconstructed fairly well, as there are many although often contradictory sources. The chronology in the appendix (see appendix 1, 2 and 3) provides a framework that makes the event straightforwardly narratable and hopefully relatable and understandable too. As Pierre Nora holds:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信