肯尼亚英语:肯尼亚英语社区社会语言学中的嵌合体

Gerry Ayieko
{"title":"肯尼亚英语:肯尼亚英语社区社会语言学中的嵌合体","authors":"Gerry Ayieko","doi":"10.56907/gml211at","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English language has spread across the globe in the last two hundred years resulting in a number of non-natives varieties of English across the globe. There is a divergence between these different varieties in phonology, morphology, syntax, lexical semantics and sentential semantics, discourse, an pragmatics as well as sociolinguistics. There is a general tendency to name these varieties based on countries such as Indian English, Nigerian English etc, the main argument in the present paper is that such terms are inaccurate from a dialectological perspective. The present study adopted a critical review methodology to critique the construct ‘Kenyan English’. The three main questions that the critical review sought to answer were: i) how is the existence of “Kenyan English’ exist as an independent variety of English conceptualised? ii) what are the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions underlying the investigation of ‘Kenyan English’? iii) to what extent can one speak of ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline with its own distinct methodology? The study reviewed fifty studies on Kenya that were selected using a criterion set up focusing on: the methodology, aims, methods, and findings of the study. The findings were thematised into ontology, epistemology, axiology and methodology and each study assessed using these parameters. The results show that the existence of “Kenyan English’ as an independent variety of English is really in doubt and lacks empirical support because of the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions used so far. There are no clear and distinct methodology or methods that have been applied in ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline. There is need to incorporate methodology and methods of standard dialectology so that the variety ‘Kenyan English’ can be established in space and time of the country Kenya.","PeriodicalId":362245,"journal":{"name":"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kenyan English: The Chimera in Sociolinguistics of English-speaking Communities in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Gerry Ayieko\",\"doi\":\"10.56907/gml211at\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The English language has spread across the globe in the last two hundred years resulting in a number of non-natives varieties of English across the globe. There is a divergence between these different varieties in phonology, morphology, syntax, lexical semantics and sentential semantics, discourse, an pragmatics as well as sociolinguistics. There is a general tendency to name these varieties based on countries such as Indian English, Nigerian English etc, the main argument in the present paper is that such terms are inaccurate from a dialectological perspective. The present study adopted a critical review methodology to critique the construct ‘Kenyan English’. The three main questions that the critical review sought to answer were: i) how is the existence of “Kenyan English’ exist as an independent variety of English conceptualised? ii) what are the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions underlying the investigation of ‘Kenyan English’? iii) to what extent can one speak of ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline with its own distinct methodology? The study reviewed fifty studies on Kenya that were selected using a criterion set up focusing on: the methodology, aims, methods, and findings of the study. The findings were thematised into ontology, epistemology, axiology and methodology and each study assessed using these parameters. The results show that the existence of “Kenyan English’ as an independent variety of English is really in doubt and lacks empirical support because of the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions used so far. There are no clear and distinct methodology or methods that have been applied in ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline. There is need to incorporate methodology and methods of standard dialectology so that the variety ‘Kenyan English’ can be established in space and time of the country Kenya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56907/gml211at\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56907/gml211at","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的200年里,英语在全球范围内传播,导致全球范围内出现了许多非本地英语变体。这些不同的变体在音韵学、词法、句法、词汇语义和句子语义、语篇、语用学以及社会语言学方面存在分歧。人们普遍倾向于根据印度英语、尼日利亚英语等国家来命名这些变体,本文的主要论点是从方言的角度来看,这些术语是不准确的。本研究采用了一种批判性的回顾方法来批判“肯尼亚英语”的结构。这篇批判性评论试图回答的三个主要问题是:i)“肯尼亚英语”是如何作为一种独立的英语概念存在的?ii)“肯尼亚英语”调查的研究范式和理论假设是什么?iii)在多大程度上可以把“肯尼亚英语”说成是一门有自己独特方法论的学科?该研究回顾了50项关于肯尼亚的研究,这些研究采用了一个标准,重点是:研究的方法论、目标、方法和结果。研究结果分为本体论、认识论、价值论和方法论,每项研究都使用这些参数进行评估。结果表明,由于目前使用的研究范式和理论假设,“肯尼亚英语”作为一个独立的英语变体的存在确实值得怀疑,缺乏实证支持。在“肯尼亚英语”作为一门学科中,没有明确和独特的方法论或方法。有必要结合标准方言的方法论和方法,以便在肯尼亚国家的空间和时间上建立“肯尼亚英语”的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kenyan English: The Chimera in Sociolinguistics of English-speaking Communities in Kenya
The English language has spread across the globe in the last two hundred years resulting in a number of non-natives varieties of English across the globe. There is a divergence between these different varieties in phonology, morphology, syntax, lexical semantics and sentential semantics, discourse, an pragmatics as well as sociolinguistics. There is a general tendency to name these varieties based on countries such as Indian English, Nigerian English etc, the main argument in the present paper is that such terms are inaccurate from a dialectological perspective. The present study adopted a critical review methodology to critique the construct ‘Kenyan English’. The three main questions that the critical review sought to answer were: i) how is the existence of “Kenyan English’ exist as an independent variety of English conceptualised? ii) what are the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions underlying the investigation of ‘Kenyan English’? iii) to what extent can one speak of ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline with its own distinct methodology? The study reviewed fifty studies on Kenya that were selected using a criterion set up focusing on: the methodology, aims, methods, and findings of the study. The findings were thematised into ontology, epistemology, axiology and methodology and each study assessed using these parameters. The results show that the existence of “Kenyan English’ as an independent variety of English is really in doubt and lacks empirical support because of the research paradigms and theoretical assumptions used so far. There are no clear and distinct methodology or methods that have been applied in ‘Kenyan English’ as a discipline. There is need to incorporate methodology and methods of standard dialectology so that the variety ‘Kenyan English’ can be established in space and time of the country Kenya.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信