论阿奎那对不可论证原则的认识中的归纳法作用

Predrag Milidrag
{"title":"论阿奎那对不可论证原则的认识中的归纳法作用","authors":"Predrag Milidrag","doi":"10.2298/theo2001017m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the 20th lectio of the second book of the Aquinas?s\n Commentary on the Posterior Analytics shows that he recognizes four types of\n non-demonstrable principles: axioms, definitions, hypotheses and so-called\n causal principles. The comparison of the axioms and the causal principles\n shows that the induction is necessary for the cognition of later ones; the\n interpretation that induction has the role in the cognition of all types of\n non-demonstrable principles is dismissed. The article makes the distinction\n between broad sense of induction (all cognition with the basis in sensed\n singulars) and strict sense of induction (the inductive process described in\n the Second Analytics). In the strict sense, the induction has no role in the\n cognition of the axioms; nevertlheless, in wider sense of the repeated\n sensations its role is to provide sensory information on the basis of which\n the intellect can apprehend the meaning of the terms used in the axiom.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of induction in the cognition of non-demonstrable principles in Aquinas\",\"authors\":\"Predrag Milidrag\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/theo2001017m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analysis of the 20th lectio of the second book of the Aquinas?s\\n Commentary on the Posterior Analytics shows that he recognizes four types of\\n non-demonstrable principles: axioms, definitions, hypotheses and so-called\\n causal principles. The comparison of the axioms and the causal principles\\n shows that the induction is necessary for the cognition of later ones; the\\n interpretation that induction has the role in the cognition of all types of\\n non-demonstrable principles is dismissed. The article makes the distinction\\n between broad sense of induction (all cognition with the basis in sensed\\n singulars) and strict sense of induction (the inductive process described in\\n the Second Analytics). In the strict sense, the induction has no role in the\\n cognition of the axioms; nevertlheless, in wider sense of the repeated\\n sensations its role is to provide sensory information on the basis of which\\n the intellect can apprehend the meaning of the terms used in the axiom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2001017m\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2001017m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对阿奎那第二本书第20篇选段的分析?在《后验分析评注》中,他认识到四种不可证明的原则:公理、定义、假设和所谓的因果原则。公理与因果原理的比较表明,归纳法是认识后发公理的必要条件;归纳法在所有类型的不可证明原则的认识中起作用的解释被驳回。本文区分了广义归纳法(一切以感测奇异点为基础的认知)和严格归纳法(第二篇分析中描述的归纳法过程)。在严格意义上,归纳法在公理的认识中没有作用;然而,在重复感觉的更广泛意义上,它的作用是提供感官信息,在此基础上,智力可以理解公理中使用的术语的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of induction in the cognition of non-demonstrable principles in Aquinas
The analysis of the 20th lectio of the second book of the Aquinas?s Commentary on the Posterior Analytics shows that he recognizes four types of non-demonstrable principles: axioms, definitions, hypotheses and so-called causal principles. The comparison of the axioms and the causal principles shows that the induction is necessary for the cognition of later ones; the interpretation that induction has the role in the cognition of all types of non-demonstrable principles is dismissed. The article makes the distinction between broad sense of induction (all cognition with the basis in sensed singulars) and strict sense of induction (the inductive process described in the Second Analytics). In the strict sense, the induction has no role in the cognition of the axioms; nevertlheless, in wider sense of the repeated sensations its role is to provide sensory information on the basis of which the intellect can apprehend the meaning of the terms used in the axiom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信