网络堆叠被认为有害

Robert Surton
{"title":"网络堆叠被认为有害","authors":"Robert Surton","doi":"10.1145/2482767.2482780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important challenge facing the future Internet is not technical, but is rather the need to justify placing trust in the technical solutions. Current network models suffer from limitations that result in practical deployments being too complex to reason about. The novel channel market model, based on composing networks by sharing channels through a flat market, offers a better opportunity for reasoning. The old language is still useful, and continues to make sense in the new model. Two design principles, the haggling principle and the composition principle, provide hints for discussing and designing networks in a channel market.","PeriodicalId":430420,"journal":{"name":"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network stacking considered harmful\",\"authors\":\"Robert Surton\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2482767.2482780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most important challenge facing the future Internet is not technical, but is rather the need to justify placing trust in the technical solutions. Current network models suffer from limitations that result in practical deployments being too complex to reason about. The novel channel market model, based on composing networks by sharing channels through a flat market, offers a better opportunity for reasoning. The old language is still useful, and continues to make sense in the new model. Two design principles, the haggling principle and the composition principle, provide hints for discussing and designing networks in a channel market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2482767.2482780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2482767.2482780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未来互联网面临的最重要的挑战不是技术,而是需要证明对技术解决方案的信任。当前的网络模型存在局限性,导致实际部署过于复杂,无法进行推理。这种新的渠道市场模型,通过一个平坦的市场,通过共享渠道组成网络,为推理提供了更好的机会。旧的语言仍然有用,并且在新模型中仍然有意义。讨价还价原则和构成原则这两个设计原则为渠道市场网络的探讨和设计提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network stacking considered harmful
The most important challenge facing the future Internet is not technical, but is rather the need to justify placing trust in the technical solutions. Current network models suffer from limitations that result in practical deployments being too complex to reason about. The novel channel market model, based on composing networks by sharing channels through a flat market, offers a better opportunity for reasoning. The old language is still useful, and continues to make sense in the new model. Two design principles, the haggling principle and the composition principle, provide hints for discussing and designing networks in a channel market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信