{"title":"甜菜耕作制度对根核-细菌根腐病复合体的影响","authors":"C. A. Strausbaugh, I. Eujayl","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.49.3.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rhizoctonia-bacterial root rot complex in sugarbeet caused by Rhizoctonia solani and Leuconostoc mesenteroidescan cause significant yield losses. To investigate the impact of different tillage systems on this complex, field studies were conducted from 2009 to 2011. Split blocks with conventional and strip tillage as main plot treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Within main plots, there were seven treatments (non-inoculated check and six R. solaniAG-2-2 IIIB strains). Regardless of tillage, the roots responded in a similar manner for fungal rot (conventional 8% versus strip 7%), bacterial rot (26% versus 34%), total rot (33% versus 41%), neighboring roots infected (1.7 roots versus 1.5 roots), distance spread (15.7 cm versus 15.0 cm), and the number of dead plants (12% versus 14%). Strains F517, F521, F551, and F552 always led to the lowest root and sucrose yield. Strip tillage resulted in 6% more root yield in 2009 (P = 0.087), while conventional tillage resulted in 7% and 27% more root yield in 2010 (P= 0.063) and 2011 (P = 0.012), respectively. The tillage systems influenced disease variables in a similar manner, but more studies will be needed to determine their impact on yield.","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Sugarbeet Tillage Systems on the Rhizoctonia-Bacterial Root Rot Complex\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Strausbaugh, I. Eujayl\",\"doi\":\"10.5274/JSBR.49.3.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Rhizoctonia-bacterial root rot complex in sugarbeet caused by Rhizoctonia solani and Leuconostoc mesenteroidescan cause significant yield losses. To investigate the impact of different tillage systems on this complex, field studies were conducted from 2009 to 2011. Split blocks with conventional and strip tillage as main plot treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Within main plots, there were seven treatments (non-inoculated check and six R. solaniAG-2-2 IIIB strains). Regardless of tillage, the roots responded in a similar manner for fungal rot (conventional 8% versus strip 7%), bacterial rot (26% versus 34%), total rot (33% versus 41%), neighboring roots infected (1.7 roots versus 1.5 roots), distance spread (15.7 cm versus 15.0 cm), and the number of dead plants (12% versus 14%). Strains F517, F521, F551, and F552 always led to the lowest root and sucrose yield. Strip tillage resulted in 6% more root yield in 2009 (P = 0.087), while conventional tillage resulted in 7% and 27% more root yield in 2010 (P= 0.063) and 2011 (P = 0.012), respectively. The tillage systems influenced disease variables in a similar manner, but more studies will be needed to determine their impact on yield.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.49.3.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.49.3.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
甜菜根丝胞菌和肠系膜白僵菌引起的根腐病-细菌根腐病复合体可造成显著的产量损失。为了研究不同耕作制度对这一建筑群的影响,2009 - 2011年进行了实地研究。以常规耕作和条带耕作为主要小区处理的分割区采用随机完全区设计,设4个重复。在主小区内,共设7个处理(未接种对照和6株茄枯病菌ag -2-2 IIIB)。无论耕作方式如何,根系对真菌腐病(常规腐病8% vs条带腐病7%)、细菌性腐病(26% vs 34%)、全腐病(33% vs 41%)、邻近根系感染(1.7根vs 1.5根)、距离传播(15.7 cm vs 15.0 cm)和死株数(12% vs 14%)的反应相似。菌株F517、F521、F551和F552的根产量和蔗糖产量均最低。带状耕作在2009年根系产量提高6% (P= 0.087),而常规耕作在2010年和2011年根系产量分别提高7%和27% (P= 0.063)和27% (P= 0.012)。耕作制度以类似的方式影响病害变量,但需要更多的研究来确定它们对产量的影响。
Influence of Sugarbeet Tillage Systems on the Rhizoctonia-Bacterial Root Rot Complex
The Rhizoctonia-bacterial root rot complex in sugarbeet caused by Rhizoctonia solani and Leuconostoc mesenteroidescan cause significant yield losses. To investigate the impact of different tillage systems on this complex, field studies were conducted from 2009 to 2011. Split blocks with conventional and strip tillage as main plot treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Within main plots, there were seven treatments (non-inoculated check and six R. solaniAG-2-2 IIIB strains). Regardless of tillage, the roots responded in a similar manner for fungal rot (conventional 8% versus strip 7%), bacterial rot (26% versus 34%), total rot (33% versus 41%), neighboring roots infected (1.7 roots versus 1.5 roots), distance spread (15.7 cm versus 15.0 cm), and the number of dead plants (12% versus 14%). Strains F517, F521, F551, and F552 always led to the lowest root and sucrose yield. Strip tillage resulted in 6% more root yield in 2009 (P = 0.087), while conventional tillage resulted in 7% and 27% more root yield in 2010 (P= 0.063) and 2011 (P = 0.012), respectively. The tillage systems influenced disease variables in a similar manner, but more studies will be needed to determine their impact on yield.