集成建模工作流在美国墨西哥湾深水油田的成功应用

Vivek Peraser, Eugene Shen, Will Dugat, M. Sweatman, Gerardo Cedillo
{"title":"集成建模工作流在美国墨西哥湾深水油田的成功应用","authors":"Vivek Peraser, Eugene Shen, Will Dugat, M. Sweatman, Gerardo Cedillo","doi":"10.2118/212173-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A Deepwater field in the Gulf of Mexico is currently in its mid-production life and undergoing development optimization, which was underpinned by a robust evaluation using multiple geologic scenarios that were history matched to observed field data. This challenge was addressed using an ensemble modeling workflow that has been guided by BP's Top-Down Reservoir Modeling (TDRMTM) (1) principles. The ensemble contained 27 distinct geologic scenarios and was used to evaluate water injection, field expansion, and infills.\n For a wide range of geologic scenarios covering alternate structural and stratigraphic models, a workflow called \"forced boxing\" was executed along with the assisted history matching algorithm, PSO-MADS (2, 3), to fully history match historical rates and pressures for more than 27 distinct combinations of geologic scenarios. These scenarios covered a wide range of oil-in place, connectivity, aquifer strength, and relative permeability behavior. The final calibrated ensemble of 1000s of models was then down sampled to ~100 distinct models to use for the probabilistic evaluation of water injection, field expansion, and infills.\n The \"forced boxing\" technique was successful at finding high quality history matches for 25 of the 27 distinct geologic scenarios. The history matching workflow considered well-level production rates, including water cut, as well as reservoir pressure measurements (MDTs). A match quality acceptance workflow was set up to find acceptable models out of each geologic scenario. The resulting ensemble of models contained over 20,000 distinct simulation cases. A methodology was used to down sample those cases to a final ensemble of ~100 models covering the 25 geologic scenarios. This workflow is an improvement to conventional history matching and uncertainty workflows because this workflow ensures multiple geologic scenarios are matched and included in the ensemble and the final set of models gives a probabilistic view of the predictive outcomes. The ~100 model ensemble was then utilized to explore different field development opportunities and included the successful selection of an economic infill producer target.\n The \"forced boxing\" approach, which entailed history matching distinct static parameter combinations, was built to ensure diversity of scenarios/outcomes as opposed to traditional workflows that focus on finding the best history matches. Given the importance of cross-fault communication between different reservoir sands, the parameterization of fault throws as a variable controlled in the optimization process was also a novel addition to the history matching workflow.","PeriodicalId":205933,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful Application of an Ensemble Modeling Workflow for a Deepwater Field in US Gulf of Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Peraser, Eugene Shen, Will Dugat, M. Sweatman, Gerardo Cedillo\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212173-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A Deepwater field in the Gulf of Mexico is currently in its mid-production life and undergoing development optimization, which was underpinned by a robust evaluation using multiple geologic scenarios that were history matched to observed field data. This challenge was addressed using an ensemble modeling workflow that has been guided by BP's Top-Down Reservoir Modeling (TDRMTM) (1) principles. The ensemble contained 27 distinct geologic scenarios and was used to evaluate water injection, field expansion, and infills.\\n For a wide range of geologic scenarios covering alternate structural and stratigraphic models, a workflow called \\\"forced boxing\\\" was executed along with the assisted history matching algorithm, PSO-MADS (2, 3), to fully history match historical rates and pressures for more than 27 distinct combinations of geologic scenarios. These scenarios covered a wide range of oil-in place, connectivity, aquifer strength, and relative permeability behavior. The final calibrated ensemble of 1000s of models was then down sampled to ~100 distinct models to use for the probabilistic evaluation of water injection, field expansion, and infills.\\n The \\\"forced boxing\\\" technique was successful at finding high quality history matches for 25 of the 27 distinct geologic scenarios. The history matching workflow considered well-level production rates, including water cut, as well as reservoir pressure measurements (MDTs). A match quality acceptance workflow was set up to find acceptable models out of each geologic scenario. The resulting ensemble of models contained over 20,000 distinct simulation cases. A methodology was used to down sample those cases to a final ensemble of ~100 models covering the 25 geologic scenarios. This workflow is an improvement to conventional history matching and uncertainty workflows because this workflow ensures multiple geologic scenarios are matched and included in the ensemble and the final set of models gives a probabilistic view of the predictive outcomes. The ~100 model ensemble was then utilized to explore different field development opportunities and included the successful selection of an economic infill producer target.\\n The \\\"forced boxing\\\" approach, which entailed history matching distinct static parameter combinations, was built to ensure diversity of scenarios/outcomes as opposed to traditional workflows that focus on finding the best history matches. Given the importance of cross-fault communication between different reservoir sands, the parameterization of fault throws as a variable controlled in the optimization process was also a novel addition to the history matching workflow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212173-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 29, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212173-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

墨西哥湾的一个深水油田目前正处于生产中期,正在进行开发优化,这是通过使用多种地质情景的可靠评估来支持的,这些地质情景与观测到的现场数据相匹配。在BP自顶向下油藏建模(TDRMTM)原则的指导下,集成建模工作流程解决了这一挑战。该集合包含27种不同的地质情景,并用于评估注水、油田扩展和填充。对于包括交替构造和地层模型的各种地质情景,采用了一种称为“强制装箱”的工作流程,并配合辅助历史匹配算法PSO-MADS(2,3),对超过27种不同地质情景组合的历史速率和压力进行了完整的历史匹配。这些场景涵盖了广泛的含油、连通性、含水层强度和相对渗透率行为。1000多个模型的最终校准集合然后被采样到100个不同的模型,用于注水、油田扩展和填充的概率评估。“强制拳击”技术成功地为27种不同的地质情景中的25种找到了高质量的历史匹配。历史匹配工作流程考虑了井位产量,包括含水率和油藏压力测量(mdt)。建立了匹配质量验收工作流程,以从每个地质场景中找到可接受的模型。最终的模型集合包含超过20,000个不同的模拟案例。使用一种方法将这些案例的样本减少到覆盖25个地质情景的约100个模型的最终集合。该工作流程是对传统历史匹配和不确定性工作流程的改进,因为该工作流程确保了多个地质场景的匹配,并包括在集成中,最终的模型集给出了预测结果的概率视图。然后利用~100模型集合来探索不同的油田开发机会,并成功选择了经济的充填生产目标。与专注于寻找最佳历史匹配的传统工作流程相反,“强制装箱”方法需要历史匹配不同的静态参数组合,以确保场景/结果的多样性。考虑到不同储层砂体之间断层间通信的重要性,在优化过程中,断层抛射量作为一个可控变量的参数化也是历史匹配工作流程的一个新补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Successful Application of an Ensemble Modeling Workflow for a Deepwater Field in US Gulf of Mexico
A Deepwater field in the Gulf of Mexico is currently in its mid-production life and undergoing development optimization, which was underpinned by a robust evaluation using multiple geologic scenarios that were history matched to observed field data. This challenge was addressed using an ensemble modeling workflow that has been guided by BP's Top-Down Reservoir Modeling (TDRMTM) (1) principles. The ensemble contained 27 distinct geologic scenarios and was used to evaluate water injection, field expansion, and infills. For a wide range of geologic scenarios covering alternate structural and stratigraphic models, a workflow called "forced boxing" was executed along with the assisted history matching algorithm, PSO-MADS (2, 3), to fully history match historical rates and pressures for more than 27 distinct combinations of geologic scenarios. These scenarios covered a wide range of oil-in place, connectivity, aquifer strength, and relative permeability behavior. The final calibrated ensemble of 1000s of models was then down sampled to ~100 distinct models to use for the probabilistic evaluation of water injection, field expansion, and infills. The "forced boxing" technique was successful at finding high quality history matches for 25 of the 27 distinct geologic scenarios. The history matching workflow considered well-level production rates, including water cut, as well as reservoir pressure measurements (MDTs). A match quality acceptance workflow was set up to find acceptable models out of each geologic scenario. The resulting ensemble of models contained over 20,000 distinct simulation cases. A methodology was used to down sample those cases to a final ensemble of ~100 models covering the 25 geologic scenarios. This workflow is an improvement to conventional history matching and uncertainty workflows because this workflow ensures multiple geologic scenarios are matched and included in the ensemble and the final set of models gives a probabilistic view of the predictive outcomes. The ~100 model ensemble was then utilized to explore different field development opportunities and included the successful selection of an economic infill producer target. The "forced boxing" approach, which entailed history matching distinct static parameter combinations, was built to ensure diversity of scenarios/outcomes as opposed to traditional workflows that focus on finding the best history matches. Given the importance of cross-fault communication between different reservoir sands, the parameterization of fault throws as a variable controlled in the optimization process was also a novel addition to the history matching workflow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信