同步网络的高效分布式算法

P. Fraigniaud, Pedro Montealegre, I. Rapaport, Ioan Todinca
{"title":"同步网络的高效分布式算法","authors":"P. Fraigniaud, Pedro Montealegre, I. Rapaport, Ioan Todinca","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2301.11988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the design of energy-efficient algorithms for the LOCAL and CONGEST models. Specifically, as a measure of complexity, we consider the maximum, taken over all the edges, or over all the nodes, of the number of rounds at which an edge, or a node, is active in the algorithm. We first show that every Turing-computable problem has a CONGEST algorithm with constant node-activation complexity, and therefore constant edge-activation complexity as well. That is, every node (resp., edge) is active in sending (resp., transmitting) messages for only $O(1)$ rounds during the whole execution of the algorithm. In other words, every Turing-computable problem can be solved by an algorithm consuming the least possible energy. In the LOCAL model, the same holds obviously, but with the additional feature that the algorithm runs in $O(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in $n$-node networks. However, we show that insisting on algorithms running in $O(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in the CONGEST model comes with a severe cost in terms of energy. Namely, there are problems requiring $\\Omega(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ edge-activations (and thus $\\Omega(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ node-activations as well) in the CONGEST model whenever solved by algorithms bounded to run in $O(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of a sharp separation between the edge-activation complexity and the node-activation complexity in the CONGEST model, for algorithms bounded to run in $O(\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Specifically, under this constraint, there is a problem with $O(1)$ edge-activation complexity but $\\tilde{\\Omega}(n^{1/4})$ node-activation complexity.","PeriodicalId":116242,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium on Structural Information & Communication Complexity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy-Efficient Distributed Algorithms for Synchronous Networks\",\"authors\":\"P. Fraigniaud, Pedro Montealegre, I. Rapaport, Ioan Todinca\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2301.11988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the design of energy-efficient algorithms for the LOCAL and CONGEST models. Specifically, as a measure of complexity, we consider the maximum, taken over all the edges, or over all the nodes, of the number of rounds at which an edge, or a node, is active in the algorithm. We first show that every Turing-computable problem has a CONGEST algorithm with constant node-activation complexity, and therefore constant edge-activation complexity as well. That is, every node (resp., edge) is active in sending (resp., transmitting) messages for only $O(1)$ rounds during the whole execution of the algorithm. In other words, every Turing-computable problem can be solved by an algorithm consuming the least possible energy. In the LOCAL model, the same holds obviously, but with the additional feature that the algorithm runs in $O(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in $n$-node networks. However, we show that insisting on algorithms running in $O(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in the CONGEST model comes with a severe cost in terms of energy. Namely, there are problems requiring $\\\\Omega(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ edge-activations (and thus $\\\\Omega(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ node-activations as well) in the CONGEST model whenever solved by algorithms bounded to run in $O(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of a sharp separation between the edge-activation complexity and the node-activation complexity in the CONGEST model, for algorithms bounded to run in $O(\\\\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Specifically, under this constraint, there is a problem with $O(1)$ edge-activation complexity but $\\\\tilde{\\\\Omega}(n^{1/4})$ node-activation complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colloquium on Structural Information & Communication Complexity\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colloquium on Structural Information & Communication Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium on Structural Information & Communication Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了局部和拥塞模型的节能算法设计。具体地说,作为复杂度的度量,我们考虑的是在算法中占据所有边或节点的最大轮数,即在所有边或节点上的最大轮数。我们首先证明了每个图灵可计算问题都有一个具有恒定节点激活复杂度的CONGEST算法,因此也具有恒定的边激活复杂度。也就是说,每个节点(resp。, edge)在发送(响应)中是活跃的。在整个算法执行过程中,只发送$O(1)$轮的消息。换句话说,每一个图灵可计算的问题都可以用消耗尽可能少的能量的算法来解决。在LOCAL模型中,显然也是如此,但有一个额外的特性,即算法在$n$节点网络中以$O(\mbox{poly}(n))$轮运行。然而,我们表明,在CONGEST模型中坚持算法以$O(\mbox{poly}(n))$轮运行会带来严重的能量成本。也就是说,在CONGEST模型中,无论何时由限定在$O(\mbox{poly}(n))$轮内运行的算法解决问题,都需要$\Omega(\mbox{poly}(n))$边激活(因此也需要$\Omega(\mbox{poly}(n))$节点激活)。最后,我们证明了在CONGEST模型中,对于限定为$O(\mbox{poly}(n))$轮运行的算法,边缘激活复杂度和节点激活复杂度之间存在明显的分离。具体来说,在这个约束下,存在$O(1)$边激活复杂度和$\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/4})$节点激活复杂度的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy-Efficient Distributed Algorithms for Synchronous Networks
We study the design of energy-efficient algorithms for the LOCAL and CONGEST models. Specifically, as a measure of complexity, we consider the maximum, taken over all the edges, or over all the nodes, of the number of rounds at which an edge, or a node, is active in the algorithm. We first show that every Turing-computable problem has a CONGEST algorithm with constant node-activation complexity, and therefore constant edge-activation complexity as well. That is, every node (resp., edge) is active in sending (resp., transmitting) messages for only $O(1)$ rounds during the whole execution of the algorithm. In other words, every Turing-computable problem can be solved by an algorithm consuming the least possible energy. In the LOCAL model, the same holds obviously, but with the additional feature that the algorithm runs in $O(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in $n$-node networks. However, we show that insisting on algorithms running in $O(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in the CONGEST model comes with a severe cost in terms of energy. Namely, there are problems requiring $\Omega(\mbox{poly}(n))$ edge-activations (and thus $\Omega(\mbox{poly}(n))$ node-activations as well) in the CONGEST model whenever solved by algorithms bounded to run in $O(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of a sharp separation between the edge-activation complexity and the node-activation complexity in the CONGEST model, for algorithms bounded to run in $O(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds. Specifically, under this constraint, there is a problem with $O(1)$ edge-activation complexity but $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/4})$ node-activation complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信