学生参与计算研究,了解参与程度和成绩

Jason G. Wells, Aaron Spence, Sophie McKenzie
{"title":"学生参与计算研究,了解参与程度和成绩","authors":"Jason G. Wells, Aaron Spence, Sophie McKenzie","doi":"10.28945/4817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: This paper focuses on understanding undergraduate computing student-learning behaviour through reviewing their online activity in a university online learning management system (LMS), along with their grade outcome, across three subjects. A specific focus is on the activity of students who failed the computing subjects.\n\nBackground: Between 2008 and 2020 there has been a multiplicative growth and adoption of Learning Analytics (LA) by education institutions across many countries. Insights gained through LA can result in actionable implementations at higher institutions for the benefit of students, including refinement of curriculum and assessment regimes, teacher reflection, and more targeted course offerings.\n\nMethodology: To understand student activity, this study utilised a quantitative approach to analyse LMS activity and grade outcome data drawn from three undergraduate computing subjects. Data analysis focused on presenting counts and averages to show an understanding of student activity.\n\nContribution: This paper contributes a practical approach towards LA use in higher education, demonstrating how a review of student activity can impact the learning design of the computing subjects. In addition, this study has provided a focus on poor performing students so that future offerings of the computing subjects can support students who are at risk of failure. \n\nFindings: The study found that:\n• Collecting data relating to student activity and analysing the activity is an important indicator of engagement, with cross referencing the data to grade outcome providing information to support modification to the learning design of the computing subjects.\n• The computing subjects in this study all had the majority of the as-sessment marks awarded at the later part of the study period.\n• Students that fail subjects are active within the LMS for the period of the subject even when they submit no assessments \n• Assessment weight and the time of delivery could influence the out-comes\n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: The collection and analysis of student activity in the LMS can enable learning designers and practitioners to better reflect the subject design and delivery to provide more informed ways of delivering the learning material.\n\nRecommendation for Researchers: Collecting LA requires a thought-out process, designed well in advance of the teaching period. This study provides useful insight that can impact other researchers in the collection of assessment related analytics. \n\nImpact on Society: The cost of education is expensive to those that undertake it. Failing, although expected, potentially can be reduced by examining how education is designed, delivered, and assessed. The study has shown how information on how students are engaging has the potential to impact their outcomes.\n\nFuture Research: Further work is needed to investigate whether intervention may assist the poor performing students to improve their grade outcomes relative to activity levels, subsequently impacting their retention.\n\n","PeriodicalId":220667,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Participation in Computing Studies to Understand Engagement and Grade Outcome\",\"authors\":\"Jason G. Wells, Aaron Spence, Sophie McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/4817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim/Purpose: This paper focuses on understanding undergraduate computing student-learning behaviour through reviewing their online activity in a university online learning management system (LMS), along with their grade outcome, across three subjects. A specific focus is on the activity of students who failed the computing subjects.\\n\\nBackground: Between 2008 and 2020 there has been a multiplicative growth and adoption of Learning Analytics (LA) by education institutions across many countries. Insights gained through LA can result in actionable implementations at higher institutions for the benefit of students, including refinement of curriculum and assessment regimes, teacher reflection, and more targeted course offerings.\\n\\nMethodology: To understand student activity, this study utilised a quantitative approach to analyse LMS activity and grade outcome data drawn from three undergraduate computing subjects. Data analysis focused on presenting counts and averages to show an understanding of student activity.\\n\\nContribution: This paper contributes a practical approach towards LA use in higher education, demonstrating how a review of student activity can impact the learning design of the computing subjects. In addition, this study has provided a focus on poor performing students so that future offerings of the computing subjects can support students who are at risk of failure. \\n\\nFindings: The study found that:\\n• Collecting data relating to student activity and analysing the activity is an important indicator of engagement, with cross referencing the data to grade outcome providing information to support modification to the learning design of the computing subjects.\\n• The computing subjects in this study all had the majority of the as-sessment marks awarded at the later part of the study period.\\n• Students that fail subjects are active within the LMS for the period of the subject even when they submit no assessments \\n• Assessment weight and the time of delivery could influence the out-comes\\n\\nRecommendations for Practitioners: The collection and analysis of student activity in the LMS can enable learning designers and practitioners to better reflect the subject design and delivery to provide more informed ways of delivering the learning material.\\n\\nRecommendation for Researchers: Collecting LA requires a thought-out process, designed well in advance of the teaching period. This study provides useful insight that can impact other researchers in the collection of assessment related analytics. \\n\\nImpact on Society: The cost of education is expensive to those that undertake it. Failing, although expected, potentially can be reduced by examining how education is designed, delivered, and assessed. The study has shown how information on how students are engaging has the potential to impact their outcomes.\\n\\nFuture Research: Further work is needed to investigate whether intervention may assist the poor performing students to improve their grade outcomes relative to activity levels, subsequently impacting their retention.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":220667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/4817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的/目的:本文的重点是通过回顾大学生在大学在线学习管理系统(LMS)中的在线活动,以及他们在三个学科的成绩结果,来了解大学生计算机学生的学习行为。一个特别的重点是那些计算机科目不及格的学生的活动。背景:从2008年到2020年,许多国家的教育机构对学习分析(LA)的采用呈成倍增长。通过LA获得的见解可以导致高等院校为学生提供可操作的实施,包括改进课程和评估制度,教师反思以及更有针对性的课程设置。方法:为了了解学生的活动,本研究采用定量方法分析LMS活动和成绩结果数据,这些数据来自三个本科计算机学科。数据分析侧重于呈现计数和平均值,以显示对学生活动的理解。贡献:本文为在高等教育中使用LA提供了一种实用的方法,展示了对学生活动的回顾如何影响计算机学科的学习设计。此外,这项研究还提供了对表现差的学生的关注,以便将来提供的计算科目可以支持那些有失败风险的学生。研究发现:•收集与学生活动有关的数据并分析活动是参与度的重要指标,将数据与评分结果交叉引用,为支持修改计算机科目的学习设计提供信息。•本研究中的计算机科目在研究后期都获得了大部分的评估分数。•科目不及格的学生即使没有提交任何评估,也会在科目期间活跃在LMS内。•评估权重和交付时间可能会影响结果。对从业者的建议:LMS中学生活动的收集和分析可以使学习设计师和从业者更好地反映科目设计和交付,以提供更明智的方式交付学习材料。给研究人员的建议:收集LA需要一个深思熟虑的过程,在教学期之前设计好。这项研究提供了有用的见解,可以影响其他研究人员在评估相关分析的收集。对社会的影响:对于那些接受教育的人来说,教育的成本是昂贵的。失败虽然是意料之中的,但通过检查教育的设计、交付和评估方式,可能会减少失败。这项研究表明,关于学生如何参与的信息有可能影响他们的成绩。未来研究:需要进一步的工作来调查干预是否可以帮助表现差的学生提高相对于活动水平的成绩,从而影响他们的保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Participation in Computing Studies to Understand Engagement and Grade Outcome
Aim/Purpose: This paper focuses on understanding undergraduate computing student-learning behaviour through reviewing their online activity in a university online learning management system (LMS), along with their grade outcome, across three subjects. A specific focus is on the activity of students who failed the computing subjects. Background: Between 2008 and 2020 there has been a multiplicative growth and adoption of Learning Analytics (LA) by education institutions across many countries. Insights gained through LA can result in actionable implementations at higher institutions for the benefit of students, including refinement of curriculum and assessment regimes, teacher reflection, and more targeted course offerings. Methodology: To understand student activity, this study utilised a quantitative approach to analyse LMS activity and grade outcome data drawn from three undergraduate computing subjects. Data analysis focused on presenting counts and averages to show an understanding of student activity. Contribution: This paper contributes a practical approach towards LA use in higher education, demonstrating how a review of student activity can impact the learning design of the computing subjects. In addition, this study has provided a focus on poor performing students so that future offerings of the computing subjects can support students who are at risk of failure. Findings: The study found that: • Collecting data relating to student activity and analysing the activity is an important indicator of engagement, with cross referencing the data to grade outcome providing information to support modification to the learning design of the computing subjects. • The computing subjects in this study all had the majority of the as-sessment marks awarded at the later part of the study period. • Students that fail subjects are active within the LMS for the period of the subject even when they submit no assessments • Assessment weight and the time of delivery could influence the out-comes Recommendations for Practitioners: The collection and analysis of student activity in the LMS can enable learning designers and practitioners to better reflect the subject design and delivery to provide more informed ways of delivering the learning material. Recommendation for Researchers: Collecting LA requires a thought-out process, designed well in advance of the teaching period. This study provides useful insight that can impact other researchers in the collection of assessment related analytics. Impact on Society: The cost of education is expensive to those that undertake it. Failing, although expected, potentially can be reduced by examining how education is designed, delivered, and assessed. The study has shown how information on how students are engaging has the potential to impact their outcomes. Future Research: Further work is needed to investigate whether intervention may assist the poor performing students to improve their grade outcomes relative to activity levels, subsequently impacting their retention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信