来自细胞块材料(cbTMA)的组织微阵列-预测病理学时代细胞学的另一个镜头:PD-L1经验

A. Iaccarino, Gennaro Acanfora, P. Pisapia, U. Malapelle, Claudio Bellevicine, G. Troncone, E. Vigliar
{"title":"来自细胞块材料(cbTMA)的组织微阵列-预测病理学时代细胞学的另一个镜头:PD-L1经验","authors":"A. Iaccarino, Gennaro Acanfora, P. Pisapia, U. Malapelle, Claudio Bellevicine, G. Troncone, E. Vigliar","doi":"10.3390/jmp3010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, predictive biomarker tests are clinically validated on histological formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition to FFPE samples, cytological samples have also emerged as a useful approach to detect predictive biomarkers. However, as of today, despite the promising results reported in the recent literature, their full implementation in routine clinical practice is still lagging owing to a lack of standardized preparatory protocols, challenging assessments of cyto-histological correlation, and variable inter-observer agreement. The aim of this report was to explore the possibility of implementing a large-scale validation of predictive biomarker testing on cytological material. To this aim, we evaluated the technical feasibility of PD-L1 assessment on a cell block (CB)-derived tissue microarray (cbTMA). Consecutive and unselected CBs prepared from metastatic lymph node fine-needle cytology (FNC) samples were retrospectively collected and used for TMA construction. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on cbTMA sections with the companion diagnostic kit SP263 assay. TMA contained 33 CB-derived cores. A total of 20 sections were hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained. Overall, 29 (88%) samples were visible at least in one H&E-stained slide. Four cases out of five sections stained with the SP263 assay (4/29, 13.8%) showed PD-L1 positivity in neoplastic and/or immune cells; remarkably, no unspecific background was observed. Although our study was based on a limited and non-selected series, our findings do provide proof of concept for the use of cbTMA in predictive biomarker testing on cytological material in large-scale post-clinical trial validation studies, multicenter studies, and quality control programs.","PeriodicalId":124426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue Microarray from Cell Block Material (cbTMA)—An Additional Shot for Cytology in the Predictive Pathology Era: The PD-L1 Experience\",\"authors\":\"A. Iaccarino, Gennaro Acanfora, P. Pisapia, U. Malapelle, Claudio Bellevicine, G. Troncone, E. Vigliar\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jmp3010002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generally, predictive biomarker tests are clinically validated on histological formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition to FFPE samples, cytological samples have also emerged as a useful approach to detect predictive biomarkers. However, as of today, despite the promising results reported in the recent literature, their full implementation in routine clinical practice is still lagging owing to a lack of standardized preparatory protocols, challenging assessments of cyto-histological correlation, and variable inter-observer agreement. The aim of this report was to explore the possibility of implementing a large-scale validation of predictive biomarker testing on cytological material. To this aim, we evaluated the technical feasibility of PD-L1 assessment on a cell block (CB)-derived tissue microarray (cbTMA). Consecutive and unselected CBs prepared from metastatic lymph node fine-needle cytology (FNC) samples were retrospectively collected and used for TMA construction. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on cbTMA sections with the companion diagnostic kit SP263 assay. TMA contained 33 CB-derived cores. A total of 20 sections were hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained. Overall, 29 (88%) samples were visible at least in one H&E-stained slide. Four cases out of five sections stained with the SP263 assay (4/29, 13.8%) showed PD-L1 positivity in neoplastic and/or immune cells; remarkably, no unspecific background was observed. Although our study was based on a limited and non-selected series, our findings do provide proof of concept for the use of cbTMA in predictive biomarker testing on cytological material in large-scale post-clinical trial validation studies, multicenter studies, and quality control programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Pathology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3010002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通常,预测性生物标志物测试在组织学福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)样品上得到临床验证。除了FFPE样本外,细胞学样本也已成为检测预测性生物标志物的有用方法。然而,直到今天,尽管在最近的文献中报道了有希望的结果,但由于缺乏标准化的准备方案,对细胞-组织学相关性的评估具有挑战性,以及不同的观察者之间的一致意见,它们在常规临床实践中的全面实施仍然滞后。本报告的目的是探讨在细胞学材料上实施预测性生物标志物测试的大规模验证的可能性。为此,我们评估了在细胞块(CB)来源的组织微阵列(cbTMA)上评估PD-L1的技术可行性。回顾性收集转移性淋巴结细针细胞学(FNC)样本制备的连续和未选择的CBs并用于TMA构建。采用伴随诊断试剂盒SP263法对cbTMA切片进行PD-L1免疫组化(IHC)检测。TMA包含33个基于cb的内核。苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色共20张切片。总体而言,29例(88%)样本至少在一张h&e染色的载玻片上可见。SP263染色的5个切片中有4个(4/ 29,13.8%)显示肿瘤细胞和/或免疫细胞中PD-L1阳性;值得注意的是,没有观察到不特定的背景。尽管我们的研究是基于有限的和非选择性的系列,我们的发现确实为cbTMA在大规模临床后试验验证研究、多中心研究和质量控制项目中对细胞学材料进行预测性生物标志物检测提供了概念证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tissue Microarray from Cell Block Material (cbTMA)—An Additional Shot for Cytology in the Predictive Pathology Era: The PD-L1 Experience
Generally, predictive biomarker tests are clinically validated on histological formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition to FFPE samples, cytological samples have also emerged as a useful approach to detect predictive biomarkers. However, as of today, despite the promising results reported in the recent literature, their full implementation in routine clinical practice is still lagging owing to a lack of standardized preparatory protocols, challenging assessments of cyto-histological correlation, and variable inter-observer agreement. The aim of this report was to explore the possibility of implementing a large-scale validation of predictive biomarker testing on cytological material. To this aim, we evaluated the technical feasibility of PD-L1 assessment on a cell block (CB)-derived tissue microarray (cbTMA). Consecutive and unselected CBs prepared from metastatic lymph node fine-needle cytology (FNC) samples were retrospectively collected and used for TMA construction. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on cbTMA sections with the companion diagnostic kit SP263 assay. TMA contained 33 CB-derived cores. A total of 20 sections were hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained. Overall, 29 (88%) samples were visible at least in one H&E-stained slide. Four cases out of five sections stained with the SP263 assay (4/29, 13.8%) showed PD-L1 positivity in neoplastic and/or immune cells; remarkably, no unspecific background was observed. Although our study was based on a limited and non-selected series, our findings do provide proof of concept for the use of cbTMA in predictive biomarker testing on cytological material in large-scale post-clinical trial validation studies, multicenter studies, and quality control programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信