Katerina Markoska, J. Masin‐Spasovska, M. Polenaković, G. Spasovski
{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病的尿蛋白生物标志物","authors":"Katerina Markoska, J. Masin‐Spasovska, M. Polenaković, G. Spasovski","doi":"10.1515/bj-2015-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as an important national and worldwide public health problem because of its consequences on quality of life and high prevalence, existing in up to one-tenth of the adults in developed countries and 13% of the general population [1,2]. Currently used diagnostic and staging tools are mostly based on non-invasive analysis of serum creatinine and/ or urinary albumin and estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). These biomarkers although widely accepted, frequently fail to identify patients at higher risk of progression or death [3,4]. They are also not reliable parameters for early diagnosis, as rising of serum creatinine levels above normal is only evident after substantial loss of renal function and its level may be affected by additional factors, such as the loss of muscle mass [5]. On the other hand, urinary albumin levels are highly variable and lack of specificity, as patients with reduced eGFR can have normal urinary albumin levels [6,7]. Still, albuminuria has been suggested to be a better predictor of accelerated loss in renal function than eGFR [8]. This is also the case in patients with diabetes mellitus, where microalbuminuria is considered as a risk for development diabetic nephropathy (DN) [9]. Nevertheless, it is still challenging to predict which diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria will develop microalbuminuria and even more, to identify those in whom GFR will decline without ever developing overt albuminuria [3]. According to KDIGO guidelines, all individuals with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2","PeriodicalId":365549,"journal":{"name":"BANTAO Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Markoska, J. Masin‐Spasovska, M. Polenaković, G. Spasovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bj-2015-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as an important national and worldwide public health problem because of its consequences on quality of life and high prevalence, existing in up to one-tenth of the adults in developed countries and 13% of the general population [1,2]. Currently used diagnostic and staging tools are mostly based on non-invasive analysis of serum creatinine and/ or urinary albumin and estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). These biomarkers although widely accepted, frequently fail to identify patients at higher risk of progression or death [3,4]. They are also not reliable parameters for early diagnosis, as rising of serum creatinine levels above normal is only evident after substantial loss of renal function and its level may be affected by additional factors, such as the loss of muscle mass [5]. On the other hand, urinary albumin levels are highly variable and lack of specificity, as patients with reduced eGFR can have normal urinary albumin levels [6,7]. Still, albuminuria has been suggested to be a better predictor of accelerated loss in renal function than eGFR [8]. This is also the case in patients with diabetes mellitus, where microalbuminuria is considered as a risk for development diabetic nephropathy (DN) [9]. Nevertheless, it is still challenging to predict which diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria will develop microalbuminuria and even more, to identify those in whom GFR will decline without ever developing overt albuminuria [3]. According to KDIGO guidelines, all individuals with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":365549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BANTAO Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BANTAO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bj-2015-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BANTAO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bj-2015-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)越来越被认为是一个重要的国家和世界范围的公共卫生问题,因为它对生活质量的影响和高患病率,在发达国家高达十分之一的成年人和13%的普通人群中存在[1,2]。目前使用的诊断和分期工具主要基于血清肌酐和/或尿白蛋白的无创分析和肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的估计。这些生物标志物虽然被广泛接受,但往往无法识别进展或死亡风险较高的患者[3,4]。它们也不是早期诊断的可靠参数,因为血清肌酐水平高于正常水平只有在肾功能严重丧失后才会明显升高,而且其水平可能受到其他因素的影响,如肌肉量的减少[5]。另一方面,尿白蛋白水平是高度可变的,缺乏特异性,因为eGFR降低的患者可能有正常的尿白蛋白水平[6,7]。尽管如此,蛋白尿被认为是比eGFR更能预测肾功能加速丧失的指标[8]。糖尿病患者也是如此,微量白蛋白尿被认为是发生糖尿病肾病(DN)的风险之一[9]。然而,预测哪些正常白蛋白尿的糖尿病患者会发展为微量白蛋白尿,甚至识别那些GFR会下降而不会发展为显性白蛋白尿的患者仍然具有挑战性[3]。根据KDIGO指南,所有估计GFR <60 mL/min/ 173 m 2的个体
Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as an important national and worldwide public health problem because of its consequences on quality of life and high prevalence, existing in up to one-tenth of the adults in developed countries and 13% of the general population [1,2]. Currently used diagnostic and staging tools are mostly based on non-invasive analysis of serum creatinine and/ or urinary albumin and estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). These biomarkers although widely accepted, frequently fail to identify patients at higher risk of progression or death [3,4]. They are also not reliable parameters for early diagnosis, as rising of serum creatinine levels above normal is only evident after substantial loss of renal function and its level may be affected by additional factors, such as the loss of muscle mass [5]. On the other hand, urinary albumin levels are highly variable and lack of specificity, as patients with reduced eGFR can have normal urinary albumin levels [6,7]. Still, albuminuria has been suggested to be a better predictor of accelerated loss in renal function than eGFR [8]. This is also the case in patients with diabetes mellitus, where microalbuminuria is considered as a risk for development diabetic nephropathy (DN) [9]. Nevertheless, it is still challenging to predict which diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria will develop microalbuminuria and even more, to identify those in whom GFR will decline without ever developing overt albuminuria [3]. According to KDIGO guidelines, all individuals with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2