持续的希望和挫折

Kopano Ratele
{"title":"持续的希望和挫折","authors":"Kopano Ratele","doi":"10.18772/12019093900.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May 1970 Noel Chabani Manganyi published a paper on hysteria among mainly African women in the South African Medical Journal (Manganyi 1970). In the same year he completed a doctorate in psychology at the University of South Africa (Manganyi 2013: 281). Depending on whether you accept or reject the idea of white men like Smuts and Wilcocks in Africa as African (taking into account that some of them may have been race supremacists and anti-black), Manganyi could be seen as the rightful father of African psychology, and the history of African psychology as beginning circa 1970. Knowledge produced by black scholars in psychology and other disciplines is indispensable. A need to draw out the ties and crossings between African psychology and black studies (as well as other fields such as African studies and cultural studies) also exists. But there is, in my estimation, a perennial danger of African psychology being conflated with psychology by black scholars. Even worse, African psychology can be relegated to studies on black people by black psychologists. Psychology by black scholars is linked, but not identical, to African psychology. African psychology is a much broader enterprise. Above all, African psychology is not a discipline. Since Manganyi began his work, there have emerged a number of radical and conservative black scholars in psychology. Black psychology students and psychologists have called for a relevant, appropriate, non-Euroamericancentred psychology for South Africa. In recent times, the call has become more insistent, and the debates more intense. It is true that these debates have also been characterised by prejudice, knee-jerk reactions, nastiness and apparent frustration. Despite that, the debates about African psychology, along with the demands for decolonisation and free education for university students, and the establishment of the Forum for African Psychology as a formal division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, have, as a call for papers in Psychology in Society stated, ‘reignited some of the old hopes and frustrations about psychology’ (Psychology in Society 2016: 1). The intensifying call for a transformed, decolonised, or African psychology ought not to be ignored. In my assessment that is what prevails: it is as if there is a hope that this demand for African psychology will go away, later if not sooner.","PeriodicalId":153683,"journal":{"name":"The World Looks Like This From Here","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continued hopes and frustrations\",\"authors\":\"Kopano Ratele\",\"doi\":\"10.18772/12019093900.96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In May 1970 Noel Chabani Manganyi published a paper on hysteria among mainly African women in the South African Medical Journal (Manganyi 1970). In the same year he completed a doctorate in psychology at the University of South Africa (Manganyi 2013: 281). Depending on whether you accept or reject the idea of white men like Smuts and Wilcocks in Africa as African (taking into account that some of them may have been race supremacists and anti-black), Manganyi could be seen as the rightful father of African psychology, and the history of African psychology as beginning circa 1970. Knowledge produced by black scholars in psychology and other disciplines is indispensable. A need to draw out the ties and crossings between African psychology and black studies (as well as other fields such as African studies and cultural studies) also exists. But there is, in my estimation, a perennial danger of African psychology being conflated with psychology by black scholars. Even worse, African psychology can be relegated to studies on black people by black psychologists. Psychology by black scholars is linked, but not identical, to African psychology. African psychology is a much broader enterprise. Above all, African psychology is not a discipline. Since Manganyi began his work, there have emerged a number of radical and conservative black scholars in psychology. Black psychology students and psychologists have called for a relevant, appropriate, non-Euroamericancentred psychology for South Africa. In recent times, the call has become more insistent, and the debates more intense. It is true that these debates have also been characterised by prejudice, knee-jerk reactions, nastiness and apparent frustration. Despite that, the debates about African psychology, along with the demands for decolonisation and free education for university students, and the establishment of the Forum for African Psychology as a formal division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, have, as a call for papers in Psychology in Society stated, ‘reignited some of the old hopes and frustrations about psychology’ (Psychology in Society 2016: 1). The intensifying call for a transformed, decolonised, or African psychology ought not to be ignored. In my assessment that is what prevails: it is as if there is a hope that this demand for African psychology will go away, later if not sooner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The World Looks Like This From Here\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The World Looks Like This From Here\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18772/12019093900.96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Looks Like This From Here","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18772/12019093900.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1970年5月,Noel Chabani Manganyi在《南非医学杂志》上发表了一篇关于主要是非洲妇女歇斯底里症的论文(Manganyi 1970)。同年,他在南非大学获得心理学博士学位(Manganyi 2013: 281)。取决于你是否接受或拒绝非洲像Smuts和Wilcocks这样的白人是非洲人的观点(考虑到他们中的一些人可能是种族至上主义者和反黑人者),Manganyi可以被视为非洲心理学之父,非洲心理学的历史始于1970年左右。黑人学者在心理学和其他学科中产生的知识是不可或缺的。也有必要找出非洲心理学和黑人研究(以及其他领域,如非洲研究和文化研究)之间的联系和交叉。但据我估计,黑人学者将非洲心理学与心理学混为一谈是一种长期存在的危险。更糟糕的是,非洲心理学可以被黑人心理学家降级为对黑人的研究。黑人学者的心理学与非洲心理学有联系,但并不完全相同。非洲心理学是一个更广泛的领域。最重要的是,非洲心理学不是一门学科。自曼格尼开始他的研究以来,出现了一批激进和保守的黑人心理学学者。黑人心理学学生和心理学家呼吁为南非建立一个相关的、适当的、非以欧美为中心的心理学。近年来,这种呼吁越来越强烈,争论也越来越激烈。的确,这些辩论也带有偏见、下意识反应、肮脏和明显的挫败感。尽管如此,关于非洲心理学的争论,以及对非殖民化和大学生免费教育的要求,以及非洲心理学论坛作为南非心理学会的一个正式部门的成立,正如《社会心理学》杂志的征文所述,“重新点燃了心理学的一些旧希望和挫折”(《社会心理学》2016:对转变、非殖民化或非洲心理的日益强烈的呼吁不应被忽视。在我的评估中,这是普遍存在的:似乎有一种希望,这种对非洲心理学的需求将会消失,如果不是更早的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continued hopes and frustrations
In May 1970 Noel Chabani Manganyi published a paper on hysteria among mainly African women in the South African Medical Journal (Manganyi 1970). In the same year he completed a doctorate in psychology at the University of South Africa (Manganyi 2013: 281). Depending on whether you accept or reject the idea of white men like Smuts and Wilcocks in Africa as African (taking into account that some of them may have been race supremacists and anti-black), Manganyi could be seen as the rightful father of African psychology, and the history of African psychology as beginning circa 1970. Knowledge produced by black scholars in psychology and other disciplines is indispensable. A need to draw out the ties and crossings between African psychology and black studies (as well as other fields such as African studies and cultural studies) also exists. But there is, in my estimation, a perennial danger of African psychology being conflated with psychology by black scholars. Even worse, African psychology can be relegated to studies on black people by black psychologists. Psychology by black scholars is linked, but not identical, to African psychology. African psychology is a much broader enterprise. Above all, African psychology is not a discipline. Since Manganyi began his work, there have emerged a number of radical and conservative black scholars in psychology. Black psychology students and psychologists have called for a relevant, appropriate, non-Euroamericancentred psychology for South Africa. In recent times, the call has become more insistent, and the debates more intense. It is true that these debates have also been characterised by prejudice, knee-jerk reactions, nastiness and apparent frustration. Despite that, the debates about African psychology, along with the demands for decolonisation and free education for university students, and the establishment of the Forum for African Psychology as a formal division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, have, as a call for papers in Psychology in Society stated, ‘reignited some of the old hopes and frustrations about psychology’ (Psychology in Society 2016: 1). The intensifying call for a transformed, decolonised, or African psychology ought not to be ignored. In my assessment that is what prevails: it is as if there is a hope that this demand for African psychology will go away, later if not sooner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信