根据与虚拟理想和反理想单位的距离对有效单位进行排序

S. H. Nasseri, H. Kiaei
{"title":"根据与虚拟理想和反理想单位的距离对有效单位进行排序","authors":"S. H. Nasseri, H. Kiaei","doi":"10.1504/IJADS.2019.10020866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data envelopment analysis (DEA) divides the units under evaluation into two groups: 1) the efficient units; 2) inefficient units. Inefficient units can be ranked in terms of effectiveness while efficient units, because of the same efficiency score being equal to one, have the same rank. Several methods have been proposed to rank efficient decision making units (DMUs). Each of these methods have certain weaknesses such as the infeasibility of the model, instability, the lack of non-extreme DMUs ranking, computational complexity, etc. In this paper, we present an alternative method that does not have the disadvantages of existing ranking techniques. The new approach is based on the evaluation of new DMUs corresponding to the efficient DMU. Also, some theorems are provided to show that the proposed model for ranking the DMUs is feasible and bounded. For this purpose, some examples are illustrated to show its difference with other methods.","PeriodicalId":216414,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking of efficient units on the basis of distance from virtual ideal and anti-ideal units\",\"authors\":\"S. H. Nasseri, H. Kiaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJADS.2019.10020866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data envelopment analysis (DEA) divides the units under evaluation into two groups: 1) the efficient units; 2) inefficient units. Inefficient units can be ranked in terms of effectiveness while efficient units, because of the same efficiency score being equal to one, have the same rank. Several methods have been proposed to rank efficient decision making units (DMUs). Each of these methods have certain weaknesses such as the infeasibility of the model, instability, the lack of non-extreme DMUs ranking, computational complexity, etc. In this paper, we present an alternative method that does not have the disadvantages of existing ranking techniques. The new approach is based on the evaluation of new DMUs corresponding to the efficient DMU. Also, some theorems are provided to show that the proposed model for ranking the DMUs is feasible and bounded. For this purpose, some examples are illustrated to show its difference with other methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2019.10020866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2019.10020866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

数据包络分析(DEA)将被评价单位分为两组:1)效率单位;2)低效机组。低效单位可以根据效率进行排名,而高效单位因为效率得分等于1,所以排名相同。提出了几种对有效决策单元(dmu)进行排序的方法。这些方法都存在模型不可行、不稳定、缺乏非极值dmu排序、计算复杂等缺点。在本文中,我们提出了一种替代方法,它没有现有排名技术的缺点。该方法基于对与有效DMU相对应的新DMU的评价。此外,还给出了一些定理,证明了所提出的dmu排序模型是可行和有界的。为此,举例说明了它与其他方法的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking of efficient units on the basis of distance from virtual ideal and anti-ideal units
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) divides the units under evaluation into two groups: 1) the efficient units; 2) inefficient units. Inefficient units can be ranked in terms of effectiveness while efficient units, because of the same efficiency score being equal to one, have the same rank. Several methods have been proposed to rank efficient decision making units (DMUs). Each of these methods have certain weaknesses such as the infeasibility of the model, instability, the lack of non-extreme DMUs ranking, computational complexity, etc. In this paper, we present an alternative method that does not have the disadvantages of existing ranking techniques. The new approach is based on the evaluation of new DMUs corresponding to the efficient DMU. Also, some theorems are provided to show that the proposed model for ranking the DMUs is feasible and bounded. For this purpose, some examples are illustrated to show its difference with other methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信