沃尔克备兑基金规则与跨法定交叉参考:为银行法服务的证券监管

Erik F. Gerding
{"title":"沃尔克备兑基金规则与跨法定交叉参考:为银行法服务的证券监管","authors":"Erik F. Gerding","doi":"10.1093/CMLJ/KMV035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Volcker Rule’s \"covered funds rule\" circumscribes bank investments and involvement in certain investment funds to limit bank risk taking and mitigate systemic risk. This article analyzes the choice by legislators and regulators in drafting the Volcker covered funds rule to use Investment Company Act definitions to set the scope of their new rule. It also examines the broader implications of this choice for coordinating banking/prudential regulations and securities/disclosure-based regulations, as well as for the more general practice of one statute or legal regime cross-referencing another. By using a securities law to define the scope of a banking law, the covered funds rule effectively transfers critical policymaking functions from one group of agencies (banking regulators) to another (the SEC). This has potentially profound implications given the differing statutory missions, cultures, and personnel of those agencies. It also has political ramifications given the different interest groups and institutional pressure points affecting securities versus banking regulators.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volcker's Covered Funds Rule and Trans-Statutory Cross References: Securities Regulation in the Service of Banking Law\",\"authors\":\"Erik F. Gerding\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CMLJ/KMV035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Volcker Rule’s \\\"covered funds rule\\\" circumscribes bank investments and involvement in certain investment funds to limit bank risk taking and mitigate systemic risk. This article analyzes the choice by legislators and regulators in drafting the Volcker covered funds rule to use Investment Company Act definitions to set the scope of their new rule. It also examines the broader implications of this choice for coordinating banking/prudential regulations and securities/disclosure-based regulations, as well as for the more general practice of one statute or legal regime cross-referencing another. By using a securities law to define the scope of a banking law, the covered funds rule effectively transfers critical policymaking functions from one group of agencies (banking regulators) to another (the SEC). This has potentially profound implications given the differing statutory missions, cultures, and personnel of those agencies. It also has political ramifications given the different interest groups and institutional pressure points affecting securities versus banking regulators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CMLJ/KMV035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CMLJ/KMV035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

沃尔克规则的“担保基金规则”限制了银行对某些投资基金的投资和参与,以限制银行承担风险并减轻系统性风险。本文分析了立法者和监管者在起草沃尔克基金规则时选择使用《投资公司法》的定义来确定其新规则的范围。它还审查了这一选择对协调银行/审慎监管和证券/披露监管的更广泛影响,以及对相互参照一项法规或法律制度的更普遍做法的影响。通过使用证券法来定义银行法的范围,保险基金规则有效地将关键的决策职能从一组机构(银行监管机构)转移到另一组机构(证券交易委员会)。鉴于这些机构的法定使命、文化和人员不同,这可能会产生深远的影响。鉴于影响证券和银行监管机构的不同利益集团和机构压力点,它还具有政治影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volcker's Covered Funds Rule and Trans-Statutory Cross References: Securities Regulation in the Service of Banking Law
The Volcker Rule’s "covered funds rule" circumscribes bank investments and involvement in certain investment funds to limit bank risk taking and mitigate systemic risk. This article analyzes the choice by legislators and regulators in drafting the Volcker covered funds rule to use Investment Company Act definitions to set the scope of their new rule. It also examines the broader implications of this choice for coordinating banking/prudential regulations and securities/disclosure-based regulations, as well as for the more general practice of one statute or legal regime cross-referencing another. By using a securities law to define the scope of a banking law, the covered funds rule effectively transfers critical policymaking functions from one group of agencies (banking regulators) to another (the SEC). This has potentially profound implications given the differing statutory missions, cultures, and personnel of those agencies. It also has political ramifications given the different interest groups and institutional pressure points affecting securities versus banking regulators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信