股骨假体间骨折:系统回顾

Ivan J. Golub, Mitchell K. Ng, R. Vakharia, K. Kang, Lisa K. Cannada
{"title":"股骨假体间骨折:系统回顾","authors":"Ivan J. Golub, Mitchell K. Ng, R. Vakharia, K. Kang, Lisa K. Cannada","doi":"10.60118/001c.37198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interprosthetic femur fractures (IFF) present unique challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to the preexisting implants in place, oftentimes advanced age and poor bone quality. Through the development of specific implants and improvement of fixation principles, management of this rare—yet growing—fracture pattern has progressed in recent decades to improve patient outcomes. This study’s aim was to identify patient-related outcomes after undergoing ORIF of interprosthetic femur fractures, including time to union, change in pre-operative ambulatory status, malunion/nonunion, surgical site infections, and revisions. A systematic review of published literature was conducted on Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for English language papers published with 12 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies providing quantitative data comparing time to union, change in ambulatory status, surgical site infections, malunion/nonunion, revisions, and one-year mortality were used in the analysis. Studies lacking quantitative data were excluded. 12 studies were included in this systematic review and graded by MINOR to identify potential biases. The aforementioned patient outcomes were calculated as mean values, ranges, and percentages. Time to union averaged 20.2 (range 6-28) weeks with roughly 18% of patients experiencing a decline in pre-operative ambulatory status. It was found 1.3% of patients experienced surgical site infections that were treated successfully either operatively or nonoperatively. Malunions and nonunions occurred in 1.63% and 6.12% of cases, respectively. Revisions were necessary in 12.6% of cases due to malunion, nonunion, and hardware failure. The one-year mortality rate was 12.8%. Our review demonstrates that interprosthetic femur fractures continue to pose significant challenges in their treatment to both patients and orthopaedic surgeons. With the expected continued growth in the number of primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty performed annually, the incidence of interprosthetic femur fractures will continue to rise. Full femur spanning locked plating is currently the standard of care in fracture patterns with stable prostheses. Therapeutic Level III","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprosthetic Femur Fractures: Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ivan J. Golub, Mitchell K. Ng, R. Vakharia, K. Kang, Lisa K. Cannada\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.37198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interprosthetic femur fractures (IFF) present unique challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to the preexisting implants in place, oftentimes advanced age and poor bone quality. Through the development of specific implants and improvement of fixation principles, management of this rare—yet growing—fracture pattern has progressed in recent decades to improve patient outcomes. This study’s aim was to identify patient-related outcomes after undergoing ORIF of interprosthetic femur fractures, including time to union, change in pre-operative ambulatory status, malunion/nonunion, surgical site infections, and revisions. A systematic review of published literature was conducted on Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for English language papers published with 12 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies providing quantitative data comparing time to union, change in ambulatory status, surgical site infections, malunion/nonunion, revisions, and one-year mortality were used in the analysis. Studies lacking quantitative data were excluded. 12 studies were included in this systematic review and graded by MINOR to identify potential biases. The aforementioned patient outcomes were calculated as mean values, ranges, and percentages. Time to union averaged 20.2 (range 6-28) weeks with roughly 18% of patients experiencing a decline in pre-operative ambulatory status. It was found 1.3% of patients experienced surgical site infections that were treated successfully either operatively or nonoperatively. Malunions and nonunions occurred in 1.63% and 6.12% of cases, respectively. Revisions were necessary in 12.6% of cases due to malunion, nonunion, and hardware failure. The one-year mortality rate was 12.8%. Our review demonstrates that interprosthetic femur fractures continue to pose significant challenges in their treatment to both patients and orthopaedic surgeons. With the expected continued growth in the number of primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty performed annually, the incidence of interprosthetic femur fractures will continue to rise. Full femur spanning locked plating is currently the standard of care in fracture patterns with stable prostheses. Therapeutic Level III\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.37198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.37198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股骨假体间骨折(IFF)对骨科医生提出了独特的挑战,因为已经存在的植入物,通常是高龄和骨质量差。通过特定植入物的发展和固定原则的改进,近几十年来,这种罕见但不断增长的骨折模式的治疗取得了进展,改善了患者的预后。本研究的目的是确定股骨假体间骨折行ORIF后患者相关的预后,包括愈合时间、术前活动状态的变化、不愈合/不愈合、手术部位感染和修复。在Pubmed/MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中对已发表的英文论文进行系统综述,其中12项研究符合纳入/排除标准。研究提供了定量数据,比较愈合时间、活动状态的变化、手术部位感染、不愈合/不愈合、修复和一年内死亡率。缺乏定量资料的研究被排除在外。本系统综述纳入了12项研究,并通过MINOR进行评分以识别潜在的偏倚。上述患者结果以平均值、范围和百分比计算。愈合时间平均为20.2周(范围6-28),约18%的患者术前活动状态下降。发现1.3%的手术部位感染患者通过手术或非手术治疗成功。畸形愈合和不愈合的发生率分别为1.63%和6.12%。12.6%的病例由于骨不连、骨不连和内固定失败而需要进行翻修。1年死亡率为12.8%。我们的综述表明,股骨假体间骨折对患者和骨科医生的治疗都是一个重大的挑战。随着每年一期全髋关节和全膝关节置换术数量的持续增长,股骨假体间骨折的发生率将继续上升。全股骨跨越锁定钢板是目前治疗骨折类型和稳定假体的标准。治疗三级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interprosthetic Femur Fractures: Systematic Review
Interprosthetic femur fractures (IFF) present unique challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to the preexisting implants in place, oftentimes advanced age and poor bone quality. Through the development of specific implants and improvement of fixation principles, management of this rare—yet growing—fracture pattern has progressed in recent decades to improve patient outcomes. This study’s aim was to identify patient-related outcomes after undergoing ORIF of interprosthetic femur fractures, including time to union, change in pre-operative ambulatory status, malunion/nonunion, surgical site infections, and revisions. A systematic review of published literature was conducted on Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for English language papers published with 12 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies providing quantitative data comparing time to union, change in ambulatory status, surgical site infections, malunion/nonunion, revisions, and one-year mortality were used in the analysis. Studies lacking quantitative data were excluded. 12 studies were included in this systematic review and graded by MINOR to identify potential biases. The aforementioned patient outcomes were calculated as mean values, ranges, and percentages. Time to union averaged 20.2 (range 6-28) weeks with roughly 18% of patients experiencing a decline in pre-operative ambulatory status. It was found 1.3% of patients experienced surgical site infections that were treated successfully either operatively or nonoperatively. Malunions and nonunions occurred in 1.63% and 6.12% of cases, respectively. Revisions were necessary in 12.6% of cases due to malunion, nonunion, and hardware failure. The one-year mortality rate was 12.8%. Our review demonstrates that interprosthetic femur fractures continue to pose significant challenges in their treatment to both patients and orthopaedic surgeons. With the expected continued growth in the number of primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty performed annually, the incidence of interprosthetic femur fractures will continue to rise. Full femur spanning locked plating is currently the standard of care in fracture patterns with stable prostheses. Therapeutic Level III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信