{"title":"结构语法中的语法范畴范式","authors":"G. Diewald, K. Politt","doi":"10.1075/BJL.00033.DIE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This squib discusses the question whether Construction Grammar can account for the assumption of universal grammatical\n categories (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994) that are prone to language change, e.g. tense.\n Most publications in Construction Grammar tackle individual constructions, such as the way-construction (Jackendoff 1990). But it remains unclear how grammatical categories as a universal phenomenon can be\n described in constructionist terms. We propose that there is a way to (a) describe grammatical categories, which per definition are encoded\n paradigmatically, as constructions themselves and (b) to thereby strengthen the assumption of a set of universal grammatical categories.","PeriodicalId":414884,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","volume":"9 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grammatical categories as paradigms in Construction Grammar\",\"authors\":\"G. Diewald, K. Politt\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/BJL.00033.DIE\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This squib discusses the question whether Construction Grammar can account for the assumption of universal grammatical\\n categories (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994) that are prone to language change, e.g. tense.\\n Most publications in Construction Grammar tackle individual constructions, such as the way-construction (Jackendoff 1990). But it remains unclear how grammatical categories as a universal phenomenon can be\\n described in constructionist terms. We propose that there is a way to (a) describe grammatical categories, which per definition are encoded\\n paradigmatically, as constructions themselves and (b) to thereby strengthen the assumption of a set of universal grammatical categories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"volume\":\"9 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00033.DIE\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00033.DIE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇短文讨论了构式语法是否可以解释容易发生语言变化的通用语法类别的假设(Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994),例如时态。大多数结构语法的出版物都是针对单个结构的,比如way-construct (Jackendoff 1990)。但是,语法范畴作为一种普遍现象,如何用建构主义的术语来描述还不清楚。我们建议有一种方法来(a)描述语法类别,每个定义都以范式方式编码,作为结构本身;(b)从而加强一组通用语法类别的假设。
Grammatical categories as paradigms in Construction Grammar
This squib discusses the question whether Construction Grammar can account for the assumption of universal grammatical
categories (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994) that are prone to language change, e.g. tense.
Most publications in Construction Grammar tackle individual constructions, such as the way-construction (Jackendoff 1990). But it remains unclear how grammatical categories as a universal phenomenon can be
described in constructionist terms. We propose that there is a way to (a) describe grammatical categories, which per definition are encoded
paradigmatically, as constructions themselves and (b) to thereby strengthen the assumption of a set of universal grammatical categories.