定居者殖民主义在巴勒斯坦的再现

Marcelo Svirsky
{"title":"定居者殖民主义在巴勒斯坦的再现","authors":"Marcelo Svirsky","doi":"10.21039/JPR.4.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical scholarship on Israel/Palestine tends to focus on conceptualising the settler colonial practices that characterise this conflict, but have failed to account for how these practices are reproduced and sustained over time. To address this gap, rather than focusing on Israel’s quantifiable strengths such as military might, the use of law, the economy, and diplomacy, this article investigates the reciprocal relations between the formation of Israeli modes of being or subjectivities, on the one hand, and the generation and distribution of settler colonial usufruct, on the other. The examination of the processes of subjectivity formation in their settler colonial register on the side of the coloniser enables to understand how the circuits of settler colonial power endure, in this particular case.","PeriodicalId":152877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reproduction of Settler Colonialism in Palestine\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Svirsky\",\"doi\":\"10.21039/JPR.4.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical scholarship on Israel/Palestine tends to focus on conceptualising the settler colonial practices that characterise this conflict, but have failed to account for how these practices are reproduced and sustained over time. To address this gap, rather than focusing on Israel’s quantifiable strengths such as military might, the use of law, the economy, and diplomacy, this article investigates the reciprocal relations between the formation of Israeli modes of being or subjectivities, on the one hand, and the generation and distribution of settler colonial usufruct, on the other. The examination of the processes of subjectivity formation in their settler colonial register on the side of the coloniser enables to understand how the circuits of settler colonial power endure, in this particular case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perpetrator Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perpetrator Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21039/JPR.4.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/JPR.4.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

关于以色列/巴勒斯坦的批判性学术倾向于将定居者的殖民行为概念化,这些行为是这场冲突的特征,但却未能解释这些行为是如何随着时间的推移而复制和维持的。为了解决这一差距,本文不是关注以色列的可量化优势,如军事力量、法律运用、经济和外交,而是研究以色列存在模式或主体性的形成与定居者殖民用益权的产生和分配之间的相互关系。站在殖民者的角度审视殖民者殖民登记册中主体性形成的过程,可以理解在这种特殊情况下,殖民者殖民权力的循环是如何持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Reproduction of Settler Colonialism in Palestine
Critical scholarship on Israel/Palestine tends to focus on conceptualising the settler colonial practices that characterise this conflict, but have failed to account for how these practices are reproduced and sustained over time. To address this gap, rather than focusing on Israel’s quantifiable strengths such as military might, the use of law, the economy, and diplomacy, this article investigates the reciprocal relations between the formation of Israeli modes of being or subjectivities, on the one hand, and the generation and distribution of settler colonial usufruct, on the other. The examination of the processes of subjectivity formation in their settler colonial register on the side of the coloniser enables to understand how the circuits of settler colonial power endure, in this particular case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信