监狱研究:欣赏还是批判?

D. Scott
{"title":"监狱研究:欣赏还是批判?","authors":"D. Scott","doi":"10.1080/09627251.2014.902207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When undertaking fieldwork in conflictual environments, such as the prison, ‘taking sides’ is an inevitable part of the research process and this moral and political dilemma is often phrased in terms of ‘whose side are you on?’. Significantly there appears to be a tendency in some recent prison officer studies to sidestep this moral quandary and present value commitments as unproblematic.","PeriodicalId":432339,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Matters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prison research: appreciative or critical inquiry?\",\"authors\":\"D. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09627251.2014.902207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When undertaking fieldwork in conflictual environments, such as the prison, ‘taking sides’ is an inevitable part of the research process and this moral and political dilemma is often phrased in terms of ‘whose side are you on?’. Significantly there appears to be a tendency in some recent prison officer studies to sidestep this moral quandary and present value commitments as unproblematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2014.902207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2014.902207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

当在冲突的环境中进行田野调查时,比如监狱,“站队”是研究过程中不可避免的一部分,这种道德和政治困境通常用“你站在哪一边?”来表达。值得注意的是,在最近的一些监狱官员研究中,似乎有一种倾向,即回避这种道德困境,认为现值承诺是没有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prison research: appreciative or critical inquiry?
When undertaking fieldwork in conflictual environments, such as the prison, ‘taking sides’ is an inevitable part of the research process and this moral and political dilemma is often phrased in terms of ‘whose side are you on?’. Significantly there appears to be a tendency in some recent prison officer studies to sidestep this moral quandary and present value commitments as unproblematic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信